—Alī and three of his sons …
They are the scions, concealed from none.
One is a scion of faith and righteousness …
And one whom Karbalā has hidden from sight.
One shall not taste death until …
He leads the cavalry, with the standard marching before it.
He withdrew into concealment(1), unseen among them(2) for a time …
At Radwā, with honey and water at hand.(3)
It is evident that, although their doctrine is self-evidently false, the doctrine of the Imamis is even more false than theirs. These people claimed the continued survival of someone who had existed as a living, well-known person, whereas the Imamis claimed the continued survival of someone who never existed at all.
Some of these say(4) that Muhammad ibn al-Hanafiyya died and that the imam after him was his son, Abū Hāshim Abd Allah. Some of this group further say that Abū Hāshim Abd Allah(5) designated his brother al-Hasan as his successor; that al-Hasan designated his son, Alī ibn al-Hasan; and that Alī died without issue. They therefore await the return of Muhammad ibn al-Hanafiyya and say that he will return and rule. Thus they are