while other claims (1) are lies falsely attributed to them, which none of them ever made. As for what some of those people did say, the majority rejected it; thus, they did not unanimously agree upon misguidance.
Moreover, the reprehensible and heinous matters (2) found among the Shia—matters contrary to the Book, the Sunnah, and consensus—are worse and more abhorrent (3) than those found in any conceivable group of Ahl al-Sunnah. There is no group of Ahl al-Sunnah (4) whose doctrine contains anything (5) weak without an even weaker and more abhorrent position being found among the doctrines of the Shia (6).
It is therefore evident, whichever way the matter is considered, that every group of Ahl al-Sunnah is better than they are. The falsehood (7) found among them, their denial of the truth, profound ignorance, belief in impossibilities, lack of reason, excessiveness in following their whims (8), and attachment to matters unknown are unparalleled in any other group.
As for his claim that sodomy with slaves is permissible, it is a lie that none of the scholars of Ahl (9) al-Sunnah ever stated. I believe he intended thereby to vilify Mālik, for I have seen ignorant people relate this claim about Mālik. Its basis is what is related from him concerning the anuses of