by the verse on ablution and the verse prohibiting wine. Yet it may not even have become nabīdh; rather, the water (1) may have remained unchanged, or undergone a slight or substantial change while still being water, according to those who permit ablution with water mixed with another substance, such as broad-bean water, chickpea water, and the like. This is the position of Abū Hanīfah and, according to most (2) reports from him, Ahmad. This position is supported by stronger evidence than the other view, because His words (3), “and find no water” [Surah al-Nisāʾ: 43] (4), contain an indefinite noun (5) in the context of negation. They therefore encompass water changed by adding these pure substances (6), just as they encompass water changed by its original constitution or by something from which it cannot be protected (7), for the wording applies equally to both—just as ablution with seawater is permissible.
Indeed (8), when the Prophet—may Allah bless him and grant him peace—was asked, “May we perform ablution with seawater? [For we travel by sea and carry only a little water with us; if we use it for ablution, we will go thirsty.” The Messenger of Allah—may Allah bless him and grant him peace—replied:] (9) “Its water is purifying, and its dead creatures are lawful.”
Al-Tirmidhī said, “It is an authentic hadith.” (10) Thus seawater is purifying, even though