was a means of nullifying the prescribed punishments of Allah Most High, for anyone against whom testimony is given that he committed fornication will, if he confirms (1) the witnesses’ testimony, have the prescribed punishment waived (2). They also deemed (3) eating dog meat and committing sodomy with slaves (4) lawful, as well as amusements such as chess and singing, and other such issues [which this abridgment has no room to discuss] (5).
The answer may be given in several ways:
The first is]: (6) that [some of these allegations are lies about all of Ahl al-Sunnah; as for the rest] (7), there is not (8) a single issue among them that the majority of Ahl al-Sunnah do not oppose. Even if some of them held such a position, then if it was mistaken, the correct view is held by other members of Ahl al-Sunnah; and if it was correct, then the correct view is likewise held by Ahl al-Sunnah. On either assumption, the correct view does not fall outside what is held (9) by Ahl al-Sunnah.
The second response is that the Rāfidah hold positions that no Muslim acquainted with the religion of Islam would hold. Some of these they agree upon, while others are held by only some of them. One example is their abandonment of Friday and congregational prayers (10), thus leaving unused (11) the mosques that were commanded