the scholars exercising independent judgment may differ over how to understand the words of the Messenger of Allah—may Allah bless him and grant him peace—(1), without every one of them being sinful (2).
The eighth point (3): No adherent of Ahl al-Sunnah has ever said that the consensus of the four imams (4) is an infallible proof. Nor has anyone said that the truth is confined (5) to their views and that whatever lies outside them is false. Rather, if a scholar who does not follow these imams—such as Sufyān al-Thawrī, al-Awzā‘ī, al-Layth ibn Sa‘d, or any of the scholars exercising independent judgment before or after them—adopts a position that differs from that of the four imams (6), the matter in which they differ must be referred to Allah and His Messenger (7). The preponderant position is the one (8) supported by the evidence.
The ninth point (9) concerns his statement: “The Companions explicitly stated that analogical reasoning should be abandoned (10).”
The response is: (11) The majority who affirm analogical reasoning have said: It is established that the Companions exercised considered judgment and independent reasoning and drew analogies, just as it is established that they condemned what