, Umar, Uthmān, and Alī—may Allah be pleased with them—(1) who upheld the imamate of the Twelve (2), or the infallibility of anyone after the Prophet—may Allah bless him and grant him peace—or who believed that the three caliphs were unbelievers. Indeed, there was not even anyone (3) who challenged the legitimacy of their rule, anyone who denied Allah’s attributes, or anyone (4) who rejected divine predestination.
The Imāmīs, then, are undoubtedly united in opposing the consensus (5) of the Prophet’s kindred, just as they oppose the consensus of the Companions. How, then, can they criticize those who have opposed neither the consensus (6) of the Companions nor that of the Prophet’s kindred?
The fifth argument (7): His statement, “They introduced four schools that did not exist during the time of the Messenger of Allah—may Allah bless him and grant him peace.” If he means that they mutually agreed to introduce these schools in opposition to the Companions, this is a lie against them. These imams did not live in (8) the same era. Rather, Abū Hanīfa died in the year (9) 150 AH; Mālik in the year (10) 179 AH; al-Shāfiī in 204 AH; and Ahmad ibn Hanbal in 241 AH; and there was no one among them