among the Imāmīs? These imams agree (1) upon loving the Companions, remaining loyal to them, and preferring them over every other generation; and (2) that their consensus constitutes authoritative proof; and (3) that they are not permitted to depart from their consensus (4). Indeed, the great majority of the leading mujtahids explicitly state that we are not permitted to depart from the statements of the Companions.
How, then, can someone who maintains that the Companions’ consensus is not authoritative proof, and who attributes unbelief and wrongdoing to them, criticize these imams for opposing the Companions?
If the Companions’ consensus constitutes authoritative proof, it is binding upon both groups; and if it does not, it cannot be invoked as evidence against them.
If he says, “Ahl al-Sunnah regard it as authoritative proof, yet they have opposed it,”
the reply is: As for Ahl al-Sunnah, it is inconceivable (5) that they would collectively agree to oppose the consensus of the Companions. As for the Imāmīs, there is no doubt that they are agreed upon opposing the consensus of the Prophet’s kindred as well as the consensus of the Companions. For there was no one (6) among the Prophet’s kindred—the Banū Hāshim—(7) during the time of the Prophet (8)—may Allah bless him and grant him peace—and Abū Bakr