testimony. (1)
This is demonstrated (2) by the fact that the Imāmiyya (3), like everyone else, consider it permissible for the Imam’s deputies not to be infallible and for the Imam not to know them to be infallible. This is evidenced by the fact that the Prophet—peace and blessings be upon him—appointed al-Walīd ibn Uqba ibn Abī Muayt, who then informed him that those to whom he had been sent were waging war. (4) Allah Most High then revealed: (5)
“O you who believe, if an evildoer brings you news, verify it, lest you harm a people unwittingly and then come to regret what you have done.”
[Surah al-Hujurāt: 6]
(6) Many of Ali’s deputies—may Allah be pleased with him—(7) betrayed him (8), and some of them fled from him. His dealings with his deputies are well known. It is therefore clear that an Imam’s being infallible does not preclude reliance upon what is outwardly apparent or the occurrence of such abuses. Requiring the Imams to be infallible is a condition that cannot be fulfilled and has not been commanded, and it has brought (9) no benefit in either religion or worldly life.