manifest partnership with Allah (1). [For this reason, these people have been likened to the Magians, who hold that the agent of evil is distinct from the agent of good, thereby assigning another partner to Allah.] (2)
His analogy involving a sovereign confirms this partnership, for a sovereign’s [deputies] (3) are his partners [in his dominion] (4). He needs them; he is neither their creator nor their lord, [nor even the creator of their power] (5). Rather, they assist him in governing his realm by handling matters beyond his power; without them, he would be incapable of ruling.
Thus, whoever places the acts of servants in relation to Allah on the same footing as the acts of a sovereign’s deputies in relation to him—this (6) is manifest shirk of a kind that even the idolaters would not have countenanced, because it (7) is shirk concerning Lordship, not worship. The idolaters acknowledged that their idols (8) were owned by Allah, saying:
“Here I am at Your service! You have no partner—except a partner (9) who belongs to You: You own him and whatever he owns.”
These people likewise regard those acts of his that the servant owns (10) as property belonging to Allah (11).