It may be said:
He mentioned(1) only a little, and he did not set out their proofs in their proper form. Even so, none of the three proofs he cited on their behalf(2) received a sound answer.
As for the first, the person advancing that proof does not contend [that](3) an act’s becoming necessary rules out power. Those who affirm divine decree maintain that the servant possesses power. This is the doctrine generally(4) held by Ahl al-Sunnah—even by the extreme affirmers(5) of divine decree, such as the Asharīs, who agree that the servant possesses power.
Abū Abd Allah al-Rāzī and others invoked this very proof. He openly states that he holds the doctrine of compulsion, yet he also maintains that(6) the servant possesses power—although they disagree as to whether that power has an effect upon what lies within its scope(7), upon some of its attributes, or has no effect at all.
[Abū al-Husayn al-Basrī and other Mutazilites(8) said: Mere power is not sufficient for an act; rather, the act also depends upon a motive. They therefore say: An agent endowed with power and choice does not