[Chapter: The Rāfidī’s claim that reason proves voluntary acts, and the response to him]
Chapter
The Rāfidī (1) said:
“Another consequence is that it entails contradicting (2) both reason and transmitted revelation. As for reason, (3) this is because, as stated previously, we possess self-evident knowledge that our voluntary acts (4) are attributable to us and occur in accordance with our will. If we intend to move (5) to the right, the movement does not occur to the left, and vice versa. Doubting this is the very essence (6) of sophistry.”
The response may be given in several ways.
First: The majority of Ahl al-Sunnah affirm precisely this: a person’s voluntary acts are attributable to him, and he performs and brings them about. The only ones who dispute (7) this are those who say that these are not the servant’s acts, that his ability has no effect upon them, and that the servant does not bring them about. These are a group of speculative theologians among those who affirm divine decree. The majority of Ahl al-Sunnah (8) do not hold this view. This is also what the revealed texts state, for (9) Allah and His Messenger describe the servant as performing deeds and acts.