divinity, such as the Dajjal, because (1) that does not indicate his truthfulness, since it is evident (2) that his claim to divinity is false. What is impossible is for proof of truthfulness to appear through a liar.
If they say, “Then allow extraordinary occurrences (3) to appear at the [hand] of one who claims (4) prophethood even though he is lying,” we reply: “[Yes] (5).” That may occur in a manner that does not indicate his truthfulness, such as the extraordinary occurrences manifested by magicians and soothsayers, which are accompanied by that which precludes their truthfulness. The discussion of this is set out at length in its proper place (6).
The fourth [aspect]: (7) The evidence for prophethood, its signs (8), and the means by which a prophet’s truthfulness is known are not confined (9) to extraordinary occurrences. Rather, the ways of recognizing truthfulness are diverse, just as the ways of recognizing falsehood are diverse, as has been explained at length in its proper place (10).
[A section from the Rāfidī’s discourse: His assertion that Ahl al-Sunnah’s position on divine decree entails suspending the prescribed penalties and deterrents against sins]
(Section)
[The Rāfidī] (11) said: “Another consequence is the suspension of the prescribed penalties and deterrents against