is neither the will nor does it necessarily entail the will. Similarly, through the liar’s report, he established that the meaning of a report is not itself knowledge. Thus, he relied on the tester’s command and the liar’s report.
Yet the majority of Ahl al-Sunnah did not accept this answer, for in reality this is not a command at all, but merely the outward presentation of a command. Likewise, a liar says with his tongue (1) what is not in his heart. The liar’s report is therefore not a report of what is within him; rather, it is an outward show of reporting [about what is] (2) within him. Thus, (3) the tester’s command is like the command of someone speaking in jest when the person commanded is unaware of his jest (4), and other analogous cases.
Therefore, if the person commanded knows the true nature (5) of the tester’s command [issued in order to punish him] (6), and that the tester intends nothing but that he disobey him, he will obey him in this situation.
There are two kinds of tester. One intends the person commanded to disobey him so that he may punish him, as in this example (7). The other intends the obedience of the person commanded and his submission (8) to the command, not the very (9) act he has been commanded to perform. An example is Allah’s command—Glorified and Exalted is He—(10) to His close friend, peace and blessings be upon him, to sacrifice his son. What was intended was Abraham’s obedience, his willingness to sacrifice his son out of love for Allah (11), and that