by the generic name (1), as with the terms “allowable” in its broad and restricted senses (2), “permissible” in its broad and restricted senses, “blood relatives” in its broad and restricted senses, and “animal” (3) in its broad and restricted senses. Thus, they apply (4) the term “animal” to (5) non-rational beings, since the rational being is specifically designated by the name “human.”
They applied the same convention to “speculative discourse” and “disputation.” Thus they say (6), “So-and-so engages in speculative discourse and is a speculative theologian” (7), when he speaks (8) without knowledge. This is why the Salaf censured speculative theologians. The same applies to disputation: if discourse is not (9) grounded in sound proof, it is nothing but sheer disputation.
Appealing to the divine decree falls into this category, as related in the Sahih from Alī—may Allah be pleased with him—who said:
“Allah’s Messenger, peace and blessings be upon him, came at night to Fātima and me and said, ‘Will you not rise and pray?’ (10) I replied, ‘O Messenger of Allah, our souls are in Allah’s hand. If He wills to rouse us, He will rouse us.’ He then turned away, saying:
‘Yet man is more contentious than anything.’” (11)
[Surah al-Kahf: 54]
For when he instructed them to rise for the night prayer, Alī sought to excuse himself