Uthmān ibn Affān, by Umar’s express designation of six men, of whom he was one, after which some of them chose him; and then Ali ibn Abī Tālib (1), through the people’s pledge of allegiance (2) to him.
They then disagreed. Some of them said that the imam after him was al-Hasan (3), while others said that it was Muāwiya [ibn Abī Sufyān] (4).
They then continued the imamate through Banū Umayya until al-Saffāh of Banū al-Abbās emerged (5), whereupon they transferred the imamate to him. The imamate (6) then passed from him to his brother al-Mansūr. Thereafter, they continued the imamate through Banū al-Abbās until al-Musta'sim.) (7).
[Ibn Taymiyya’s Refutation of the Falsehood and Distortion in the Account of the Positions of Ahl al-Sunnah and the Rāfidah]
[The First Point: Affirmation and Denial of the Divine Decree Are Found among Groups on Both Sides]
I say: This account of the positions of Ahl al-Sunnah and the Rāfidah contains lies and distortions, some of which we shall mention (8).
It may be addressed from several perspectives:
First: Introducing questions of divine decree, justice, and injustice (9) into this subject is an invalid line of argument—