al-Hasan (1) of the Qadarī doctrine, since he vehemently condemned sins and forbade them. Accordingly, one finds such people objecting to anyone who condemns wrongdoing and saying, “What these people did (2) had been decreed for them.” Such a person (3) is told: “This denouncer’s condemnation is also by Allah’s decree, so you have contradicted your own claim by your own words.”
One of their shaykhs says, “I disbelieve in a Lord who is disobeyed.” He also says, “Even if I killed seventy prophets, I would not be at fault.” (4) One of their poets says:
“I am but a passive instrument of what He chooses to bring forth from me;
Thus all my deeds are acts of obedience.” (5)
Some people suppose that Adam’s invocation of predestination in his argument with Moses falls into this category. This (6) is profound ignorance. The prophets were among the foremost in enjoining what Allah commanded, forbidding what Allah prohibited, and censuring those whom Allah censured. They were sent solely to command obedience to Allah (7) and forbid disobedience to Him. How, then, could any one of them (8) permit someone to disobey Allah while invoking predestination as an excuse? Moreover, Adam—peace be upon him—had already repented of the sin, and one who repents of a sin is like one who has no sin. Were predestination a valid excuse, it would also have been an excuse for Iblīs, Pharaoh, and all other disbelievers. Rather, Moses blamed Adam [peace be upon them both] (9) because of the calamity (10)