wa-l-Jamāʿa (1), for which they may be reproached (2). Rather, a sect is blameworthy only for what its leading figures (3) and scholars have said, as we have explained regarding the imams of the Shia. Indeed, it is the imams of the Shia who espouse those abhorrent doctrines, as is well known.
[The Term “Assimilationists”]
As for the designation “Assimilationists” (4), there is no doubt that Ahl al-Sunnah wa-l-Jamāʿa and Ahl al-Hadith—among the followers of Mālik, al-Shāfiʿī, Abū Hanīfa, Ahmad, and others—unanimously agree on declaring Allah Most High far above any likeness to creation and [on] condemning (5) the Assimilationists, who liken His attributes to those of His creation (6). They also unanimously agree that nothing whatsoever resembles Allah, whether in His Essence, His attributes, or [in] His actions (7).
(1) (B) and (A) read: “that this belief should be attributed to Ahl al-Sunnah wa-l-Jamāʿa.”
(2) (N) reads: “they are reproached for this.” Mustajī Zādah wrote the following in the margin of manuscript (ع): “I say: In more than one passage of the tafsīr al-Kashshāf, the designation ‘Hashwiyya’ is applied to Ahl al-Sunnah. Likewise, al-Baydāwī’s tafsīr mentions the Hashwiyya in several places. From the statements of these authorities—namely, the Shia, al-Zamakhsharī, and al-Baydāwī—I have understood that, in their view, anyone who professes the teachings of the Salaf in matters of creed, interprets the texts according to their apparent meanings, and does not divert them from those meanings according to personal opinions—as do the Jahmiyya and those who followed them among the Muʿtazila, the Rāfida, and the later Hanafis and Shāfiʿīs (the original reads: *wa-mutaʾakhkharū*)—is one of the Hashwiyya. Thus, in their view, all the Hanbalis are Hashwiyya. The same applies to Ahl al-Hadith, such as al-Bukhārī, Muslim, Ishāq ibn Rāhawayh, Sufyān al-Thawrī, Sufyān ibn ʿUyayna, Hammād ibn …, and those hadith imams who follow their path: all of them are Hashwiyya in their view.”
(3) The word “leading figures” is omitted in (A) and (B).
(4) Al-Tahānawī states in *Kashshāf Istilāhāt al-Funūn*: “The term *al-Mushabbiha* (Assimilationists) is an active-participle form derived from *tashbīh* (assimilation). It is applied to one of the major Islamic sects whose adherents likened Allah to created beings and compared Him to temporally originated things. For this reason, we have classified them as a single sect professing assimilation, although they differ in how they do so.” On the Mushabbiha, see also *al-Milal wa-l-Nihal*, vol. 1, pp. 95–99; *Dāʾirat al-Maʿārif al-Islāmiyya*, entry “al-Tashbīh”; and the preceding discussion, vol. 2, p. 102.
(5) (B) and (A) read: “and condemning”; (N) and (M) read: “and you are,” which is a corruption.
(6) (B), (A), (N), and (M) read: “those who compare His attributes *bihi* (‘by Him’) to the attributes of creation.”
(7) (N) and (M) read: “nor His actions.”