for all these matters, some of which are conditional upon others, are necessary concomitants of His essence, and their being established does not depend upon anything other than Him.
[The] Eighth Aspect (1):
His statement, “They did not regard Him as powerful by virtue of His essence (2 nor knowing by virtue of His essence 2) (2), but rather by virtue of eternal attributes”: if he means by this that they [do not] (3) regard His essence itself as knowledge and power, or that they do not (4) regard it as knowing and powerful (5) while it possesses neither knowledge nor power, then this is correct and is the very truth. But if he means that they do not regard His essence [as necessarily entailing His being knowing and powerful, nor] (6) as what necessitates His being knowing and powerful, then this is a false allegation against them. Rather, His essence is what necessitates that, just as it necessitates His being knowing while also necessitating His being (7) living: He cannot be knowing unless He is living. Likewise, these people say that He cannot be knowing unless He possesses knowledge.
The Ninth Aspect (8):
His statement, “They did not regard Him as knowing by virtue of His essence [or] (9) powerful by virtue of His essence”: if he means that they did not regard Him (10) as knowing and powerful by virtue of an essence divested [of knowledge and power—as those who deny the attributes say: that He is an essence divested] (11) of the attributes—then this is correct [and is the very