His own essence, for His essence necessarily entails knowledge, and knowledge necessarily entails His being knowing. His essence (1) is what necessitates both. [Thus, if (2) His essence is supposed to necessitate both, its necessitating both would be greater than its necessitating only one of them] (3), provided neither is a deficiency. It is well known that knowledge is a perfection and that His being knowing is a perfection. Thus, if His essence necessitates both, it is just as if it necessitated life and power.
The Seventh Aspect (4):
His statement, “They made Him dependent, in His being knowing, upon the existence of a meaning—namely, knowledge,” is misleadingly phrased. The term (5) “dependence” suggests that He needs someone to make Him knowing by imparting knowledge to Him. This is false. Rather, this follows necessarily from His essence: His essence necessitates both His knowledge and His being knowing. [The meaning of its necessitating this is that it necessarily entails it—that is, His essence can only be knowing—not that His essence brought knowledge into being or produced it] (6).
Whoever affirms both meanings says: He cannot be knowing unless He has knowledge. He is unquestionably knowing; therefore, He has knowledge. Thus, he regards this as a matter of inference and infers knowledge from His being knowing.
He says that His essence necessitates this; it is not that anything other than His essence made Him knowing or gave Him knowledge. Even if His essence were supposed to necessitate it through an intermediary, whatever necessitates the necessitating factor likewise necessitates its outcome. Similarly, His essence necessitates His being living and His being knowing, while knowledge is conditional upon life. It therefore cannot (7) be said that, in being knowing, He depends upon anything other than Himself,