Al-Iklīl fī al-Mutashābih wa-al-TaʾwīlIbn Taimiya

from their rightful contexts to fit whatever he has already concluded to be true. In doing so he is following what is ambiguous, for names resemble other names and the realities they denote resemble other realities, yet they differ from them far more than they resemble them. Such people cling to that ambiguity “seeking dissension” (3:7) by casting up doubts about the possibility that these realities could exist in Paradise, and “seeking its interpretation” so as to reduce it to the familiar things they know in this world.

Allah the Exalted says, “None knows its interpretation except Allah.” Concerning these very realities He also says, “No soul knows what comfort is kept hidden for them as a reward for what they used to do” (32:17)—neither an angel brought near nor a messenger-prophet knows it.

As for His words, “and none knows its interpretation,” the pronoun may refer either to the Book as a whole or to its ambiguous passages. If it refers to the Book, as in His words “so those in whose hearts is deviance follow what is ambiguous of it, seeking dissension and seeking its interpretation” (3:7), the meaning is sound; for every verse of the Book, whether definitive or ambiguous, that informs us of the unseen which we are commanded to believe—none knows the true nature of that unseen, nor when it will take place, except Allah alone.

One may cite as evidence that Allah has ascribed interpretation to the entire Book even while declaring it detailed, in His words: “We have certainly brought them a Book which We have elaborated with knowledge, as guidance and mercy for a people who believe” (7:52) and “Are they waiting for anything but its interpretation? The Day its interpretation comes…” (7:53). Thus He made the future interpretation apply to the fully detailed Book.

We have already explained that no one knows that interpretation—its timing, measure, kind, or reality—except Allah; we only know some of its attributes to the extent of our limited understanding, for nothing in our world matches it. The same point is made in His statement: “Rather, they have denied that which they cannot encompass with their knowledge, and its interpretation has not yet reached them” (10:39).

عن مواضعه إلى ما اعتقد ثبوته. وكان في هذا أيضا متبعا للمتشابه إذ الأسماء تشبه الأسماء والمسميات تشبه المسميات ولكن تخالفها أكثر مما تشابهها. فهؤلاء يتبعون هذا المتشابه {ابتغاء الفتنة} بما يوردونه من الشبهات على امتناع أن تكون في الجنة هذه الحقائق {وابتغاء تأويله} ليردوه إلى المعهود الذي يعلمونه في الدنيا. قال الله تعالى: {وما يعلم تأويله إلا الله} فإن تلك الحقائق قال الله فيها: {فلا تعلم نفس ما أخفي لهم من قرة أعين} لا ملك مقرب ولا نبي مرسل. وقوله: {وما يعلم تأويله} إما أن يكون الضمير عائدا على الكتاب أو على المتشابه؛ فإن كان عائدا على الكتاب كقوله (منه و (منه {فيتبعون ما تشابه منه ابتغاء الفتنة وابتغاء تأويله} فهذا يصح؛ فإن جميع آيات الكتاب المحكمة والمتشابهة التي فيها إخبار عن الغيب الذي أمرنا أن نؤمن به لا يعلم حقيقة ذلك الغيب ومتى يقع إلا الله. وقد يستدل لهذا أن الله جعل التأويل للكتاب كله مع إخباره أنه مفصل بقوله {ولقد جئناهم بكتاب فصلناه على علم هدى ورحمة لقوم يؤمنون} {هل ينظرون إلا تأويله يوم يأتي تأويله} فجعل التأويل الجائي للكتاب المفصل. وقد بينا أن ذلك التأويل لا يعلمه وقتا وقدرا ونوعا وحقيقة إلا الله وإنما نعلم نحن بعض صفاته بمبلغ علمنا لعدم نظيره عندنا وكذلك قوله: {بل كذبوا بما لم يحيطوا بعلمه ولما يأتهم تأويله}

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies