Al-Qawl al-Sadid fi al-Radd ala Man Ankara Taqsim al-TawhidAbd al-Razzaq ibn Abd al-Muhsin al-Badr

and among those who most strongly warned against it. He followed criteria and principles in this matter derived from the Book of Allah Most High. He did not declare anyone an unbeliever according to his own whims, as misguided innovators do; rather, he declared unbelievers those whom the Quran and Sunnah declare unbelievers.

He said, may Allah have mercy on him:

“Yet I have always been—as those who have sat with me know—among those most emphatic in forbidding that a particular individual be declared an unbeliever, an evildoer, or a sinner, unless it is known that the proof conveyed by the Messenger has been established against him. Whoever contravenes that proof is an unbeliever in some cases, an evildoer in others, and a sinner in yet others. I affirm that Allah has forgiven this community its errors, and this includes errors in matters of belief as well as matters of practice.

The early generations continued to disagree over many of these matters, yet none of them declared another to be an unbeliever, an evildoer, or a sinner…

I would explain to them that the general pronouncements reported to them from the early generations and the imams—declaring those who say such-and-such to be unbelievers—are also true. However, one must distinguish between pronouncing a ruling in general terms and applying it to a particular individual. This was the first of the major fundamental issues over which the community disagreed: the question of threatened punishment. The Quranic texts threatening punishment are stated without qualification, as in His words:

‘Indeed, those who devour the property of orphans unjustly’ 1—to the end of the verse.

The same applies to all other statements of the form, ‘Whoever does such-and-such will receive such-and-such’: these are unqualified, general statements.

They are like the statements of some of the early generations: ‘Whoever says such-and-such is such-and-such.’ In the case of a particular individual, however, the threatened punishment ceases to apply through repentance, good deeds that erase sins, afflictions that expiate them, or accepted intercession.

1 Surah al-Nisā’, verse 10.
وأكثرهم نهياً عنه، وله فيها ضوابط وقواعد مستمدة من كتاب الله تعالى، ولم يكن يكفِّر أحداً بهواه كما هو شأن المبتدعة الضلال، بل يكفِّر من كفَّره الكتاب والسنة. قال ﵀: "هذا مع أنِّي دائماً ومن جالسني يعلم ذلك مني أنِّي من أعظم الناس نهياً عن أن ينسب معيَّن إلى تكفير وتفسيق ومعصية، إلا إذا علم أنَّه قد قامت عليه الحجة الرسالية التي من خالفها كان كافراً تارة وفاسقاً أخرى وعاصياً أخرى، وإنِّي أقرر أنَّ الله قد غفر لهذه الأمة خطأها وذلك يعم الخطأ في المسائل الخبرية القولية والمسائل العملية. وما زال السلف يتنازعون في كثير من هذه المسائل ولم يشهد أحد منهم على أحد لا بكفر ولا بفسق ولا معصية.. وكنت أبين لهم أنَّما نقل لهم عن السلف والأئمة من إطلاق القول بتكفير من يقول كذا وكذا فهو أيضاً حقٌّ، لكن يجب التفريق بين الإطلاق والتعيين، وهذه أول مسألة تنازعت فيها الأمة من مسائل الأصول الكبار وهي مسألة الوعيد فإنَّ نصوص القرآن في الوعيد مطلقة كقوله: ﴿إِنَّ الذِينَ يَأْكُلُونَ أَمْوَالَ الْيَتَامَى ظُلْماً﴾ ١ الآية وكذلك سائر ما ورد: من فعل كذا فله كذا فإنَّ هذه مطلقة عامة. وهي بمنزلة قول من قال من السلف من قال كذا فهو كذا. ثم الشخص المعين يلتغي حكم الوعيد فيه بتوبة، أو حسنات ماحية، أو مصائب مكفرة، أو شفاعة مقبولة.
١ سورة النساء، الآية ١٠.

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies