Al-Qawl al-Sadid fi al-Radd ala Man Ankara Taqsim al-TawhidAbd al-Razzaq ibn Abd al-Muhsin al-Badr

the people of misguidance and innovation. He is the man called Hasan ibn ʿAlī al-Saqqāf. Praise be to Allah, I have not examined any of his books except one that I had the misfortune to read: “Denouncing Those Who Divide Monotheism into Categories: Refuting the Attempt to Introduce Trinitarianism into Monotheism and the Islamic Creed.” I was appalled by its contents, for he had ruled that Muslims at large—who affirm Allah’s oneness in His lordship, His names and attributes, and His divinity—had introduced a trinity into their creed.

It is well known that the Trinity is a false Christian doctrine whose adherents Allah has declared disbelievers in the Quran. I never imagined that anyone could be so audacious as to pass such a judgment or make such a false and unjust assertion, until I encountered the words of this wretched, doomed man. I say, as someone once said:

Allah postponed my death, and so it was delayed,
Until I saw what wonders time displayed.

This is from the book’s title alone. As for its contents, they include many astonishing claims, bizarre notions and grave enormities, any one of which would suffice to exclude the man from the ranks of scholars—indeed, even from the ranks of rational people. Allah will reckon with him for what he has put forward, and before Allah the disputants will gather. Having read his book in full, the following became clear to me about him:

First: He is a staunch Jahmī who holds that his Lord is not to be described as either outside the world or within it, and he falsely and dishonestly attributes this view to Ahl al-Sunnah wa-l-Jamāʿah.

Second: I found him to be a consummate distorter of scholars’ statements and texts.

Third: I found him much given to lying, deception and obfuscation.

Fourth: He is also sharp-tongued and foul-mouthed, leveling grave accusations against Ahl al-Sunnah. Examples include his descriptions of them on p. 6 as “pseudo-Salafīs” and on p. 12 as “people with minds given to shallow, superficial thinking,” and his words on p. 17: “So claim your glory in corporealism

أهل الضلال والبدعة، وهو المدعو حسن بن علي السقاف، ولم أقف على شيء من كتبه ولله الحمد، إلا كتاباً واحداً بُليت بقراءته وهو كتاب: "التنديد بمن عدَّد التوحيد. إبطال محاولة التثليث في التوحيد والعقيدة الإسلامية". فهالني ما فيه إذ قد حكم على عامة المسلمين الموحدين لله في ربوبيته وأسمائه وصفاته وألوهيته بأنهم ثلثوا في عقيدتهم. ومن المعلوم أن التثليث عقيدة نصرانية فاسدة حكم الله في القرآن على أهلها بالكفر، ولم أحسب أنَّ أحداً تبلغ به الجرأة أن يحكم بهذا الحكم أو يقرر هذا التقرير الباطل الجائر حتى وقفت على كلام هذا المسكين الهالك. وأقول ما قيل: الله أخر موتتي فتأخرت ... حتى رأيت من الزمان عجائباً هذا من عنوان الكتاب فحسب، أما مضمونه فقد اشتمل على عجائب وغرائب وطوام كثيرةٍ كل واحدة منها كافية في إخراج الرجل من دائرة العلماء بل ومن دائرة العقلاء فحسيبه الله على ما قدم، وعند الله تجتمع الخصوم. ومن قراءتي لكتابه كاملاً ظهر لي من حال الرجل ما يلي: أولاً: كونه جهميًّا جلداً يرى أنَّ ربه لا يوصف بأنَّه خارج العالم ولا داخله وينسب ذلك زوراً وباطلاً إلى أهل السنة والجماعة. ثانياً: وجدته محرِّفاً من الدرجة الأولى لأقوال أهل العلم ونصوصهم. ثالثاً: وجدته كثير الكذب والتدليس والتلبيس. رابعاً: ثم هو سليط اللسان، بذيء القول، يرمي أهل السنة بالعظائم، ومن أمثلة ذلك قوله عنهم: ص: ٦ "المتمسلفين" وص: ١٢ "أصحاب العقول ذات التفكير السطحي الضحل" وص: ١٧ "فخذ مجدك في التجسيم

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies