Al-Qawl al-Sadid fi al-Radd ala Man Ankara Taqsim al-TawhidAbd al-Razzaq ibn Abd al-Muhsin al-Badr

1 Their inclusion of the denial of the divine attributes under their statement, “with none like Him in His attributes.” Consequently, in their view, anyone who says that Allah possesses knowledge and power, that He will be seen in the Hereafter, that the Quran is the speech of Allah, revealed and uncreated, or that He has a Face, hearing, sight, and other attributes, is regarded as likening Allah to His creation, not affirming His oneness!!

Ibn Abd al-Barr said: “They claim that whoever affirms these attributes likens Allah to His creation, whereas those who affirm them regard these people as denying the One who is worshipped”1.

2 Their inclusion, under their statement, “He is One in His essence, without division,” of the denial that Allah is above His Throne, separate and distinct from His creation, along with similar notions that entail denying and negating Him. They count this as tawhīd, yet this tawhīd ultimately amounts to saying that above the Throne there is no God to be worshipped and no Lord to whom prayer and prostration are offered!!

3 Their failure, in this classification, to mention tawhīd in worship and the call to sincere devotion to Allah and to dedicating every form of worship to Him alone—the very essence and spirit of the messengers’ call. They make absolutely no mention of this kind of tawhīd.

4 The best-known of their three categories is the third: oneness in acts, meaning that the Creator of the universe is one. They suppose that this is the tawhīd that is required. Yet it is well known that even if the polytheists affirmed all of this, they would not be free of the polytheism that Allah attributed to them in the Quran and for which the Messenger, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, fought them, unless they worshipped Allah alone. This is in addition to the false notions and corrupt, deviant beliefs contained in their classification, some of which have already been noted2.

1 Al-Tamhīd, 7:145. 2 See also Ibn Taymiyyah, Al-Fatāwā, 3:97101.
١ إدخالهم نفي الصفات تحت قولهم "ولا شبيه له في صفاته" فصار عندهم مَن يقول: إنَّ لله علماً وقدرة، أو أنَّه يُرى في الآخرة، أو أنَّ القرآن كلام الله منزل غير مخلوق، أو أنَّ له وجهاً وسمعاً وبصراً وغير ذلك من الصفات، مشبِّهاً ليس بِموحِّد!!. قال ابن عبد البَّر: "ويزعمون أنَّ من أقرَّ بها مشبه، وهم عند من أثبتها نافون للمعبود"١. ٢ إدخالهم تحت قولهم: "هو واحد في ذاته لا قسيم له" نفي علو الله على عرشه، ومباينته لخلقه، وامتيازه عنهم، ونحو ذلك من المعاني المستلزمة لنفيه وتعطيله، ويجعلون ذلك من التوحيد، وغاية هذا التوحيد أنَّه ليس فوق العرش إلهٌ يُعبد ولا ربٌ يُصلى له ويسجد!! ٣ إهمالهم في هذا التقسيم لذكر توحيد الألوهية والدعوة إلى إخلاص الدين لله وإفراده وحده بجميع أنواع العبادة، الذي هو زبدة دعوة الرسل وروحها، فهذا النوع من التوحيد لا ذكر له عندهم البتة. ٤ أشهر الأنواع الثلاثة عندهم هو الثالث وهو توحيد الأفعال، وهو أنَّ خالق العالم واحد، ويظنون أنَّ هذا التوحيد المطلوب، ومن المعلوم أنَّ المشركين لو أقروا بذلك كله لم يخرجوا من الشرك الذي وصفهم الله به في القرآن وقاتلهم عليه الرسول ﷺ ما لم يأتوا بتوحيد الألوهية هذا مع ما في تقسيمهم من أمور باطلة وعقائد منحرفة فاسدة سبق الإشارة إلى بعضها٢.
١ التمهيد (٧/١٤٥) . ٢ وانظرها في الفتاوى لابن تيمية (٣/٩٧١٠١) .

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies