Al-Risālah al-AkmalīyahIbn Taimiya

Section

As for the claim:

“If anything existed within His dominion that He did not will, that would be an imperfection,”

and the other claim:

“If He predestined and then punished, that would be injustice—and injustice is an imperfection,”

it may be answered:

The first assertion is evident. For if it were supposed that within His dominion there existed something that He did not will, over which He had no power, and which He neither created nor brought into being, this would constitute an imperfection in several respects.

First:

For anything to bring events into existence independently of Him would be an imperfection, even if it were assumed to lie outside His dominion—so how much more if it lay within His dominion?

We know that if we suppose two beings, one upon whom everything depends while he depends upon nothing, and another upon whom some things depend while others have no need of him, the first is more perfect. Thus, the mere fact that anything should lie beyond His power and creation is an imperfection. These are proofs of divine oneness: partnership is an imperfection in each partner, whereas absolute perfection lies only in oneness.

We know that one who possesses power independently is more perfect than one who needs a helper; one who does everything himself is more perfect than one who has a partner and assistant in doing some things; and one upon whom everything depends is more perfect than one of whom some things have no need.

Another respect is that being the Creator of all things and having power over all things is more perfect than creating only some things and having power over only some things.

The Qadarites do not affirm that He is the Creator of all things or that He has power over all things.

فصل وأما قول القائل: لو كان في ملكه ما لا يريده لكان نقصًا. وقول الآخر: لو قدر وعَذَّب لكان ظلمًا، والظلم نقص. فيقال: أما المقالة الأولى فظاهرة، فإنه إذا قدر أنه يكون في ملكه ما لا يريده وما لا يقدر عليه، وما لا يخلقه ولا يحدثه، لكان نقصًا من وجوه: أحدها: أن انفراد شىء من الأشياء عنه بالأحداث نقص لو قدر أنه في غير ملكه فكيف في ملكه؟ فإنا نعلم أنا إذا فرضنا اثنين: أحدهما: يحتاج إليه كل شىء، ولا يحتاج إلى شىء، والآخر: يحتاج إليه بعض الأشياء، ويستغنى عنه بعضها، كان الأول أكمل، فنفس خروج شىء عن قدرته وخلقه نقص، وهذه دلائل الوحدانية؛ فإن الاشتراك نقص بكل من المشتركين، وليس الكمال المطلق إلا في الوحدانية. فإنا نعلم أن من قدر بنفسه كان أكمل ممن يحتاج إلى معين، ومن فعل الجميع بنفسه فهو أكمل ممن له مشارك ومعاون على فعل البعض، ومن افتقر إليه كل شىء، فهو أكمل ممن استغنى عنه بعض الأشياء. ومنها: أن يقال: كونه خالقًا لكل شىء وقادرًا على كل شىء، أكمل من كونه خالقًا للبعض وقادرًا على البعض. والقدرية لا يجعلونه خالقًا لكل شىء، ولا قادرًا على كل شىء.

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies