Al-Radd ʿalā al-ManṭiqiyyīnIbn Taimiya

It is also indispensable to acknowledge gradation in rank, the very purport of analogical (mushakkik) terms which stand opposite to the strictly univocal ones; that is exactly what the Qur’anic demonstrative arguments convey, for they are in essence an a fortiori inference (qiyās al-awlā).

Equally indispensable is the affirmation of the Lord’s unique attribute whereby He is set apart from everything besides Him. This is what His signs, exalted is He, point to—signs whose very existence entails the existence of His own Self. No syllogism, whether demonstrative or otherwise, can establish this.

Hence it is evident that their demonstrative syllogism fails to secure the goal by which the soul attains perfection in knowing created beings and in knowing their Creator—let alone to claim that none of these truths can be known except through it.

The subject is vast, yet our purpose here is only to expose the falsity of their negative claim, namely that theoretical sciences are acquired solely by means of their syllogistic method.

The monstrosity of their further claim that even God’s knowledge is produced by syllogism:

Not content with that sweeping negation—by which they fenced in what is broad and confined knowledge to a narrow path that yields but a trivial gain—they further alleged, as Ibn Sīnā and his followers state, that God’s own knowledge, and the knowledge of His Prophets and His friends, is obtained only through a syllogism containing a middle term.

In asserting this they are, to be sure, better than their predecessors who denied God’s knowledge altogether, and denied the knowledge of His Prophets—people who were among the most ignorant of all concerning the Lord of all beings, His Prophets, and His Books.

Yet when Ibn Sīnā, endowed with greater intellect and learning, adopted their logical procedure to articulate that view, those who followed this path—though more learned than their forerunners and more refined in understanding—proved more misguided than Jews and Christians and even more ignorant. For the latter possessed a measure of faith in the Necessary Existent and His attributes that these errant thinkers never attained, owing to the pride and illusion lodged in their breasts. They are of the party of Pharaoh and his ilk; hence you invariably find them belittling or opposing Moses and those with him among the followers of revealed religions and sacred laws.

ولا بد من إثبات التفاضل وهو مدلول المشككة التي هي قسيم المتواطئة الخاصة وذلك هو مدلول الأقيسة البرهانية القرآنية وهي قياس الأولى. ولا بد من إثبات خاصة الرب التي بها يتميز عما سواه وذلك مدلول آياته سبحانه التي يستلزم ثبوتها ثبوت نفسه لا يدل على هذه قياس لا برهاني ولا غير برهاني. فتبين بذلك أن قياسهم البرهاني لا يحصل المطلوب الذي به تكمل النفس في معرفة الموجودات ومعرفة خالقها فضلا عن أن يقال لا تعلم المطالب إلا به. وهذا باب واسع لكن المقصود في هذا المقام التنبيه على بطلان قضيتهم السالبة وهي قولهم أن العلوم النظرية لا تحصل إلا بواسطة برهانهم. شناعة زعمهم أن علم الله أيضا يحصل بواسطة القياس: ثم لم يكفهم هذا السلب العام الذي تحجروا فيه واسعا وقصروا العلوم على طريق ضيقه لا تحصل إلا مطلوبا لا طائل فيه حتى زعموا أن علم الله وعلم أنبيائه وأوليائه إنما يحصل بواسطة القياس المشتمل على الحد الأوسط كما يذكر ذلك ابن سينا وأتباعه. وهم في إثبات ذلك خير ممن نفى علمه وعلم أنبيائه من سلفهم الذين هم من اجهل الناس برب العالمين وبأنبيائه وبكتبه. فابن سينا لما تميز عن أولئك بمزيد عقل وعلم سلك طريقهم المنطقي في تقرير ذلك وصاروا سالكوا هذه الطريق وإن كانوا اعلم من سلفهم وأكمل فهم أضل من اليهود والنصارى وأجهل إذ كان أولئك حصل لهم من الإيمان ب واجب الوجود وصفاته ما لم يحصل لهؤلاء الضلال لما في صدورهم من الكبر والخيال وهم من أتباع فرعون وأمثاله ولهذا تجدهم لموسى ومن معه من أهل الملل والشرائع متنقصين أو معادين

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies