Al-Rad 'ala al-JahmiyaAhmad Ibn Hanbal

He continued:

One of them said to me, “Allah, the Almighty, says, ‘Allah is the Creator of everything’ (al-Zumar 39:62). Is the Quran not a thing?”

I replied, “Allah, the Almighty, also says, ‘It destroyed everything by the command of its Lord’ (al-Ahqaf 46:25). Yet did it destroy anything beyond what it was sent upon?”

Another of them objected, quoting, “Whenever a new reminder (dhikr) comes to them from their Lord …” (al-Anbiya 21:2). “Can something be called ‘new’ without being created?”

I answered, “Allah, the Almighty, says, ‘Sad. By the Quran rich in Reminder’ (Sad 38:1). The ‘reminder’ here is the Quran, whereas in your verse the word appears without the definite article—there is neither alif nor lam.”

Abu ʿAmro—Hamzah ibn al-Qasim—narrated to us; he said: Hanbal narrated to us; he said: Abu ʿAbd Allah related to us a report similar to this; he said, “So I told them, ‘In that verse the word is indefinite, so it may refer to any kind of reminder, whereas the definite form—al-dhikr—is the Quran.’”

Abu ʿAmro 1—ʿUthman ibn ʿUmar al-Darraj—informed me; he said: Abu Bakr—Ahmad ibn Muhammad ibn Harun al-Khallal—narrated to us; he said: Ahmad ibn al-Husayn al-Warraq wrote to me from Mosul; he said: Bakr ibn Muhammad ibn al-Hakam narrated to us from his father, from Abu ʿAbd Allah. I asked him about the proof he advanced when he appeared before those people. He said, “They cited against me the verse, ‘Whenever a new reminder comes to them from their Lord …’ (al-Anbiya 21:2), arguing that the Quran is new (muhdath). I countered them with the verse, ‘Sad. By the Quran rich in Reminder’ (Sad 38:1). I said, ‘He has named it the Reminder,’ and I added, ‘Whenever a new reminder comes to them from their Lord …’ This could

(1) In al-Ibana, 2/250, the name appears as “Umar”; the form retained here is the correct one. See: Tarikh Baghdad, 11/305, no. 6098.
قال: فقال لي بعضهم: قال الله عز وجل: {اللَّهُ خَالِقُ كُلِّ شَيْءٍ} [الزمر: ٦٢] فالقرآن أليس هو شيئًا؟ فقلت: قال الله عز وجل: {تُدَمِّرُ كُلَّ شَيْء} [الأحقاف: ٢٥] فهل دمرت إلا ما أتت عليه. فقال لي بعضهم: {مَا يَأْتِيهِمْ مِنْ ذِكْرٍ مِنْ رَبِّهِمْ مُحْدَثٍ} [الأنبياء: ٢] أفيكون محدث إلا مخلوقًا؟ قال: فقلت لهم: قال الله عز وجل: {ص وَالْقُرْآنِ ذِي الذِّكْرِ} [ص: ١] فالذكر هو القرآن، وتلك ليس فيها ألف ولا لام ". حدثنا أبو عمرو -حمزة بن القاسم- قال: حدثنا حنبل، قال: حدثنا أبو عبد الله بنحو هذه القصة، قال: "فقلت لهم: هذا نكرة، فقد يكون على جميع الذكر، والذكر معرفة وهو القرآن ". وأخبرني أبو عمرو ١-عثمان بن عمر الدراج- قال: حدثنا أبو بكر -أحمد بن محمد بن هارون الخلال- قال: كتب إليّ أحمد بن الحسين الوراق -من الموصل - قال: حدثنا بكر بن محمد بن الحكم عن أبيه عن أبي عبد الله، قال: سألته عما احتج به حين دخل على هؤلاء، فقال: "احتجوا عليَّ بهذه الآية: {مَا يَأْتِيهِمْ مِنْ ذِكْرٍ مِنْ رَبِّهِمْ مُحْدَثٍ} [الأنبياء: ٢] أي: أن القرآن محدث، فاحتججت عليهم بهذه الآية: {ص وَالْقُرْآنِ ذِي الذِّكْرِ} [ص: ١] قلت: فهو سماه الذكر وقلت: {مَا يَأْتِيهِمْ مِنْ ذِكْرٍ مِنْ رَبِّهِمْ مُحْدَثٍ} فهذا يمكن أن
١ في الإبانة ٢٥٠/٢: "عمر" والمثبت هو الصواب، انظر: تاريخ بغداد ٣٠٥/١١، رقم ٦٠٩٨.

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies