al-Hadith Hujjah bi Nafsihi fi al-Aqaid wa al-AhkamNasir al-Din al-Albani

Chapter Three: The Authority of Solitary Reports in Creed and Law

Introduction

Those who contend that a solitary report (ḥadīth al-āḥād) cannot establish matters of creed simultaneously affirm that the legal rulings of the Sharīʿah are proven by such reports. By doing so they have drawn a distinction between creed and law. Can that distinction be found in the previously cited Qur’anic and prophetic texts? Absolutely not. Their general and unrestricted wording embraces doctrinal matters as well, obligating us to follow the Prophet ﷺ in them. Without doubt they fall under His words “a matter” in the verse:

“It is not for a believing man or a believing woman, once Allah and His Messenger have decided any matter, to have any choice about their affair.” ⦗Al-Aḥzāb 36⦘

Similarly, Allah’s command to obey His Prophet ﷺ, His prohibition against disobeying him, His warning to those who oppose him, and His praise for the believers who, when called to judgment before Allah and His Messenger, say, “We hear and we obey,” all point to the obligation of obeying and following him ﷺ in both creed and practice.

The same applies to His statement:

“So take whatever the Messenger gives you.” ⦗Al-Ḥashr 7⦘

Here the word “whatever” is, as is well known, a term of complete generality and inclusiveness. Were you to ask those who insist on accepting solitary reports in legal matters for their evidence, they would cite these very verses and others we have omitted for brevity—verses that Imām al-Shāfiʿī, d. 204 AH, gathered exhaustively in his work al-Risālah. Whoever wishes may consult them. What, then, has led them

الفصل الثالث: حديث الآحاد حجة في العقائد والأحكام مدخل ... الفصل الثالث: حديث الآحاد حجة في العقائد والأحكام إن القائلين بأن حديث الآحاد لا تثبت به عقيدة يقولون في الوقت نفسه بأن الأحكام الشرعية ثبتت بحديث الآحاد وهم بهذا قد فرقوا بين العقائد والأحكام فهل تجد هذا التفريق في النصوص المتقدمة من الكتاب والسنة كلا وألف كلا بل هي بعمومها وإطلاقاتها تشمل العقائد أيضا وتوجب اتباعه ﷺ فيها لأنها بلا شك مما يشمله قوله "أمرا" في آية ﴿وَمَا كَانَ لِمُؤْمِنٍ وَلا مُؤْمِنَةٍ إِذَا قَضَى اللَّهُ وَرَسُولُهُ أَمْراً أَنْ يَكُونَ لَهُمُ الْخِيَرَةُ مِنْ أَمْرِهِمْ﴾ [الأحزاب: ٣٦] وهكذا أمره تعالى بإطاعة نبيه ﷺ والنهي عن عصيانه والتحذير من مخالفته وثناوه على المؤمنين الذين يقولون عندما يدعون للتحاكم إلى الله ورسوله: سمعنا وأطعنا كل ذاك يدل على وجوب طاعته واتباعه ﷺ في العقائد والأحكام. وقوله تعالى: ﴿وَمَا آتَاكُمُ الرَّسُولُ فَخُذُوهُ﴾ [الحشر: ٧] فإنه "ما" من ألفاظ العموم والشمول كما هو معلوم. وأنت لو سألت هؤلاء القائلين بوجوب الأخذ بحديث الآحاد في الأحكام عن الدليل عليه لاحتجوا بهذه الآيات السابقة وغيرها مما لم نذكره اختصارا وقد استوعبها الإمام الشافعي رحمه الله تعالى في كتابه "الرسالة" فليراجعها من شاء فما الذي حملهم

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies