al-Tawassul: Anwauhu wa AhkamuhuNasir al-Din al-Albani

Second: it appears in the exposition of the verse, and any report transmitted in that capacity carries the force of a marfūʿ narration, as established in its proper discipline—­all the more so when it comes from the leading exegete, ʿAbd Allāh ibn ʿAbbās (may Allah be pleased with them both), for whom the Messenger of Allah ﷺ prayed: “O Allah, give him understanding of the religion and teach him the interpretation.”

Some have explained these “words” as the plea found in the other verse: “They said, ‘Our Lord, we have wronged ourselves; and if You do not forgive us and have mercy on us, we will surely be among the losers’” (Q 7:23). Sayyid Rashīd Riḍā affirmed this categorically in his Tafsīr (1/279). Ibn Kathīr (1/81), however, indicated that the view is weak. In my judgment there is no conflict between the two explanations; rather, each completes the other. The report of Ibn ʿAbbās does not specify what Adam عليه السلام said after he received those words from his Lord, and the second verse clarifies that omission. Thus there is no contradiction—praise be to Allah. The ḥadīth’s opposition to the Qur’an therefore stands proven, rendering it invalid.

The second point of contention is its final statement: “Were it not for Muhammad, I would not have created you.” This is a grave doctrinal claim that, by unanimous agreement, can be established only by a mass-transmitted text—or, according to some, by at least an authentic narration. Had it been sound, it would have appeared in the Qur’an or in rigorously authentic Sunnah. To presume its truth while the decisive text that would serve as proof has supposedly been lost clashes with the divine declaration: “Surely We have sent down the Reminder, and surely We will guard it” (Q 15:9).

Here, “the Reminder” encompasses the entire revealed law, Qur’an and Sunnah alike, as Ibn Ḥazm established in al-Iḥkām. Moreover, Allah Most High has already informed us of the purpose for which He created Adam and his offspring: “I did not create jinn and mankind except to worship Me” (Q 51:56). Anything that contradicts or adds to this purpose is unacceptable unless supported by a sound text from the infallible Prophet ﷺ—just as this fabricated ḥadīth clearly contradicts it.

الثاني: أنه ورد في تفسير الآية، وما كان كذلك فهو في حكم المرفوع كما تقرر في محله، ولا سيما إذا كان من قول إمام المفسرين عبد الله بن عباس ﵄ الذي دعا له رسول الله ﷺ بقوله: "اللهم فقهه في الدين، وعلمه التأويل". وقد قيل في تفسير هذه الكلمات: إنها ما في الآية الاخرى ﴿قَالا رَبَّنَا ظَلَمْنَا أَنْفُسَنَا وَإِنْ لَمْ تَغْفِرْ لَنَا وَتَرْحَمْنَا لَنَكُونَنَّ مِنَ الْخَاسِرِينَ﴾ . وبهذا جزم السيد رشيد رضا في "تفسيره" "١/٢٧٩". لكن أشار ابن كثير "١/٨١" إلى تضعيفه، ولا منافاة عندي بين القولين، بل أحدهم يتمم الآخر، فحديث ابن عباس لم يتعرض لبيان ما قاله آدم ﵇ بعد أن تلقى من ربه تلك الكلمات وهذا القول يبين ذلك، فلا منافاة والحمد لله، وثبت مخالفة الحديث للقرآن، فكان باطلاً. الموضع الثاني: قوله في آخره: "ولولا محمد ما خلقتك" فإن هذا أمر عظيم يتعلق بالعقائد التي لا تثبت إلا بنص متواتر اتفاقاً، أو صحيح عند آخرين، ولو كان ذلك صحيحاً لورد في الكتاب والسنة الصحيحة، وافتراض صحته في الواقع مع ضياع النص الذي تقوم به الحجة ينافي قوله ﵎: ﴿إِنَّا نَحْنُ نَزَّلْنَا الذِّكْرَ وَإِنَّا لَهُ لَحَافِظُونَ﴾ . والذكر هنا يشمل الشريعة كلها قرآناً وسنة، كما قرره ابن حزم في "الإحكام" وأيضاً فإن الله ﵎ قد أخبرنا عن الحكمة التي من أجلها خلق آدم وذريته، فقال ﷿: ﴿وَمَا خَلَقْتُ الْجِنَّ وَالْأِنْسَ إِلَّا لِيَعْبُدُونِ﴾ ، فكل ما خالف هذه الحكمة أو زاد عليها لا يقبل إلا بنص صحيح عن المعصوم ﷺ كمخالفة هذا الحديث الباطل.

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies