Al-KāfīIbn Abd al-Barr

before the pre-emptor has asserted his claim, the latter may take it under whichever of the two sales he prefers. The right of pre-emption takes effect once the sale is fully concluded; it becomes due at that moment, and title passes when the price is paid.

If a holder of one of the fixed, designated shares in an estate (dhawu al-furūḍ) sells his portion of property subject to pre-emption, he is more entitled to exercise pre-emption than the ʿaṣabah (agnatic heirs). Conversely, should one of the ʿaṣabah sell his share, all his co-owners—whether fellow ʿaṣabah or fixed-share heirs—stand on the same footing with respect to pre-emption: the fixed-share heirs may override the ʿaṣabah, while the ʿaṣabah may not override a shareholder who already has someone sharing that very share with him. Some jurists say that neither group overrides the other; others say that each may override the other, for the operative cause is joint ownership and indivision. All three views are reported within the Medinan Mālikī school, yet the first is the position that best represents Mālik.

Example: A man dies leaving two daughters and certain ʿaṣabah. If one of the ʿaṣabah sells his share, the two daughters may join the remaining ʿaṣabah in claiming pre-emption. If, however, one of the daughters sells, her sister has the stronger claim, and none of the ʿaṣabah may join her. Likewise, if the deceased were a brother who left sons, and one of those sons sells, their paternal uncles may not pre-empt with them; the sons alone have the superior claim. But if the heirs are a mixture of full brothers and consanguine half-brothers, and a full brother sells, the consanguine brothers may join him in pre-emption, for their common father unites them.

Should a man donate or bequeath a share of a house to several persons, and one of those recipients then sells the share that was given or bequeathed to him, the donor’s (or testator’s) heirs may, if they wish, join the seller’s co-sharers in exercising pre-emption; none of those recipients, however, may intrude upon the heirs in the pre-emption they pursue among themselves.

When a house is owned jointly by two men, and one of them donates his share or turns it into an endowment, and thereafter his partner sells his own share, then no

المشتري قبل قيام الشفيع كان الشفيع مخيرا في أخذها بأي صفقتين شاء والشفعة تجب بالبيع التام وتستحق وتملك باداء الثمن وأهل الغرض المسمى في الميراث إذا باع أحدهم حصته مما فيه الشفعة أولى بالشفعة فيه من العصبة وأن باع أحد العصبة نصيبه فشركاؤه بالتعصيب وذو الفروض المسماة كلهم سواء في الشفعة يدخل أهل الفرض على العصبة ولا تدخل العصبة على ذي السهم مع من شركه في السهم وقد قيل لا يدخل هؤلاء على هؤلاء ولا هؤلاء على هؤلاء وقيل يدخل كل واحد منهم على صاحبه لأن العلة الشركة والإشاعة وكل مذهب مدني مالكي والأول هو تحصيل مذهب مالك مثال ذلك رجل تخلف ابنتيه وعصبة وتخلف ربعا فو باع بعض العصبة حصته دخلت الابنتان مع سائر العصبة وان باعت احدى الابنتين كانت اختها أحق بالشفعة ولا يدخل معها فيها أحد من العصبة وكذلك لو كانوا اخوة ومات أحدهم وتخلف بنين فباع أحد البنين لم يشفع أعمامهم معهم وكانوا أحق بشفعتهم ولو كان أخوة لعلات فباع أحد الأشقاء دخل معهم الأخوة للأب في الشفعة لأن الأب يجمعهم وإذا تصدق رجل أو أوصى بشقص من دار لنفر فباع أحد أولئك النفر نصيبه مما تصدق به عليه أو أوصى له به دخل ورثة الموصي في الشفعة أن أحبوا مع شركاء البائع ولا يدخل أحد من أولئك النفر على الورثة فيما يتشافعون فيه وإذا كانت دار بين رجلين فتصدق أحدهما بحصته منها أو حبسها وباع شريكه بعد ذلك نصيبه فلا

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies