Al-KāfīIbn Abd al-Barr

all circumstances, whether its partition would injure one of the co-owners or not. A number of Mālik’s companions adopted this view, while another group rejected it; that latter opinion is attributed to Ibn al-Qāsim. According to Ibn al-Qāsim’s position—his refusal to divide anything whose division would damage either party—no pre-emption is due, because splitting a bathhouse would ruin it and it would cease to be a bathhouse. He likewise held that when two men share a single date-palm and one of them sells his share, there is no right of pre-emption, since the tree itself cannot be divided, whereas most of Mālik’s associates maintain that pre-emption does apply in such a case.

Counted among the “principal properties” we have listed are the water-springs sold together with the land, as well as a well sold with it. There is, however, no pre-emption in a well that is sold on its own, nor in a pathway, a male date-palm, or a watercourse. If the well is accompanied by undivided farmland, then pre-emption applies when it is sold along with that land; the same holds true if it is sold with the cultivated black soil that is irrigated together with its orchards. Should a co-owner first sell his share of the land and only later sell his share of the well, his partners have no right of pre-emption in the well; equally, if they have already divided the land and the date-palms and one of them then sells his share of the well, the others have no pre-emption.

Yaḥyā narrates from Ibn al-Qāsim, from Mālik, that pre-emption applies to water which the heirs apportion among themselves in measured bucket-loads (aqlād), even if they are not partners in the lands irrigated by those springs. Mālik said: The people of each single allotment exercise pre-emption among themselves, not the entire group of heirs as a whole; the ruling is the same as for houses and land. As for the male date-palm, the well-known position in Mālik’s school is that no pre-emption attaches to it, although a group of his followers held that it does. Comparable to the male date-palm is the open space (farṣah) which its owners leave for the benefit of neighbours and for passage; no pre-emption applies to it except

قسمة ذلك ضرر على أحد المتقاسمين أو لم يكن وقال بقول مالك في ذلك طائفة من أصحابه وطائفة منهم تأبى ذلك وهو مذهب ابن القاسم وعلى مذهب ابن القاسم في ابايته من قسمة ما يدخله الضرر على أحدهما لا يجب في ذلك شفعة لأنه يبطل الحمام بقسمته فلا يكون حماما وقوله في النخلة بين الرجلين ببيع أحدهما حصته منها انه لا شفعة فيها لأنها لا تنقسم وأكثر أصحاب مالك يرون الشفعة في ذلك ويدخل في الأصول التي ذكرنا عيون الماء المبيعة مع الأرض والبئر كذلك ولا شفعة في بئر مفردة ولا طريق ولا فحل نخل ولا مسيل ماء فإن كانت البئر لها أرض تزرع مشاعة فالشفعة فيها إذا بيعت مع الأرض وكذلك لو بيعت مع السواد الذي يسقى مع بساتينها ولو باع حصته من الأرض ثم باع حصته بعد من البئر لم يكن فيها لشركائه شفعة وكذلك لو اقتسموا الأرض والنخل ثم باع أحدهم حصته من البئر لم يكن لشركائه شفعة وروى يحيى عن ابن القاسم عن مالك أنه قال الشفعة في الماء التي يقتسمها الورثة بالاقلاد وأن لم يكونوا شركاء في الأرضين التي تسقى بتلك العيون قال مالك وأهل كل قلد يتشافعون فيما بينهم دون فجماعة الورثة كالدور والأرضين سواء وفحل النخل لا شفعة فيه في المشهور من مذهب مالك وقال طائفة من أصحابه فيه الشفعة ومثل فحل النخل الفرصة يتركها أهلها للارتفاق والاستطراق فلا شفعة فيها إلا على

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies