Al-KāfīIbn Abd al-Barr

the empowerment as well. Under the first opinion, if while they are still seated they shift to any other subject, affair, or activity—not in any way related to the empowerment—her authority is nullified. Some of our colleagues support this ruling with the Divine words, “Do not sit with them until they turn to some other discourse” (Qur’an 4:140).

The point at which empowerment (tamlīk) diverges from giving the option (takhyīr) in the view of Mālik and his companions is that, once he empowers his wife, he may say, “I have put part of the divorce in your hand, not all of it,” or, “I have placed one pronouncement in your hand,” or, “I have placed more,” and he must swear to that effect. The wife, for her part, may likewise carry out only the portion assigned to her—unlike the case with takhyīr.

Typical wording of empowerment includes: “Your affair is in your hand,” “Your divorce is in your hand,” “Divorce yourself,” and the like. Whatever authority he has thus transferred remains with her; she may exercise it as she wishes so long as the two of them remain in the same session. Mālik also said that what is in her hand remains established and is not terminated merely by her standing up from the session, as we have already related from him concerning takhyīr.

According to this second view, if a man empowers his wife regarding her affair and she says, “I accept,” “I am content,” or “I choose,” and they then part before she issues a pronouncement of divorce, the empowerment still stands. Should she say, “I accept my affair; if I choose to divorce, it is mine to do,” then the choice is hers; if she does not wish to divorce, no divorce takes place. But if she says, “I accept and I choose myself,” a divorce becomes binding upon him by that statement. If, after saying “I choose myself,” she claims she did not intend a divorce, her claim is not accepted.

If she merely says, “I accept the empowerment,” and, when asked what she meant, replies, “I meant nothing,” nothing becomes binding on the husband. Anyone who says to his wife, “Your affair is in your hand,” and she answers, “I accept,” is asked what she intended by her acceptance: if she intended a divorce, one revocable pronouncement takes effect; if she says

الحاكم تمليكها وعلى القول الأول إذا حدث في غير ذلك من حديث أو عمر أو شيء أو ما ليس من التمليك في شيء سقط تمليكها واحتج بعض أصحابنا في هذا بقول الله ﷿ فلا تقعدوا معهم حتى يخوضوا في حديث غيره النساء والذي يفارق فيه التمليك التخيير عند مالك وأصحابه انه إذا ملك امرأته كان له أن يقول ملكتك بعض الطلاق دون جميعه أو ملكتك واحدة أو ملكتك أكثر ويحلف على ذلك وكان للمرأة أن تقضي بالبعض من ذلك أيضا بخلاف التخيير والتمليك قوله أمرك بيدك أو طلاقك بيدك أو طلقي نفسك ونحو هذا من القول وما جعل إليها من ذلك يكون بيدها تقضي فيه ما شاءت ما داما في مجلسهما وقد قال مالك أيضا إن الذي بيدها ثابت لا يلزمها قيامها من المجلس على ما ذكرنا عنه في التخيير فعلى هذا القول الآخر من ملك امرأته أمرها فقالت قد قبلت أو رضيت أو اخترت ثم افترقا قبل أن توقع طلاقا فالتمليك ثابت فإن قالت قبلت أمري فإن أردت الطلاق فذلك لها وإن لم ترد الطلاق لم يكن طلاقا وإن قالت قد قبلت واخترت نفسي لزمه بهذا القول الطلاق فإن قالت لم أرد طلاقا بعد قولها اخترت نفسي لم يقبل قولها وإن قالت قد قبلت التمليك ثم سئلت ما أردت فقالت ما أردت شيئا لم يلزم الزوج شيء وكل من قال لزوجته أمرك بيدك فقالت قد قبلت سئلت ماذا أرادت بقولها قد قبلت فإن أرادت الطلاق طلقت طلقة رجعية وإن قالت

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies