Al-KāfīIbn Abd al-Barr

Chapter: Doubt concerning divorce, the wife’s return under the remainder of her revocable divorces, and divorce pronounced before marriage.

Mālik—may Allah have mercy on him—maintained that when a man swears an oath of divorce regarding some matter and then becomes unsure whether he has broken it or not, he ought to separate from his wife, though the court should not compel him to do so. Ibn al-Qāsim held instead that the divorce becomes binding upon him.

There is no disagreement that if the man is uncertain whether he ever divorced her at all, nothing is incumbent upon him, nothing becomes binding, and the marriage remains valid.

If he is certain that he did swear by divorce but does not know whether he swore by one, two, or three pronouncements, and then violates the oath, Mālik rules that three divorces take effect.

Mālik is likewise unwavering in his view that if a man divorces one of his wives but cannot recall which one, all of them are deemed divorced.

Whoever says, “I do not know whether I swore and then broke the oath or not,” incurs no liability.

The scholars are also unanimous that anyone who dies while still uncertain about his divorce

باب الشك في الطلاق وعودة المرأة على بقية طلاق العصمة وفي الطلاق قبل النكاح كان مالك ﵀ يرى فيمن حلف بالطلاق على شيء ثم شك هل حنث أم لا أن يفارق امرأته ولا يجبره على ذلك وقال ابن القاسم يلزمه الطلاق ولم يختلف أنه لو شك هل طلقها أم لا أنه ليس عليه شيء ولا يلزمه شيء وأنه على نكاحه ولو أيقن أنه حلف بالطلاق ولم يدر أبواحدة حلف أو باثنتين أو بثلاث ثم حنث لزمه عند مالك الثلاث ولم يختلف قول مالك في من طلق امرأة من نسائه ولم يدر أيتهم المطلقة انهن يطلقن عليه كلهن ومن قال لا أدري حلفت فحنثت أم لا فلا شيء عليه ولم يختلف العلماء في من شك في طلاقه ومات

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies