Al-KāfīIbn Abd al-Barr

from the quarry toward a carcass it has noticed, and later, of its own accord and without any prompting from its handler, rushes back after the game some time later, nothing it then kills may be eaten. If its diversion is only momentary—no more than a brief turn while still tracking the prey—that causes no harm.

Should the dog slip away in pursuit of game and its owner afterwards whistles, calls, or scolds it, the animal it takes may not be eaten. Some have said, however, that if he calls it after it has bolted, pronounces Allah’s name, and the dog responds, the quarry is lawful; the first view is that of Mālik.

Whoever sees something he assumes to be a pig or another predator, shoots at it on that assumption, and kills it, only to find that it was lawful game, may not eat it.

If a hunter pulls a living animal from the dogs’ mouths after they have wounded it, but—through no fault of his own—fails to slaughter it before it dies, it is still lawful to eat. If he is negligent in performing the slaughter, the meat is not lawful.

Game taken with a poisoned arrow may not be eaten unless the arrow itself killed the animal by piercing its vital organs. If the arrow reached the vital points before the poison spread, eating the meat is permissible, though disliked because of the danger of the toxin. Whenever there is doubt, one must refrain; it is lawful only when it is certain that the arrow, not the poison, caused the death.

Game on which the dogs have neither bitten nor inflicted a wound is not to be eaten. Some, however, allow it if the animal died from the force of the dog’s impact even without a bite or wound; this is the opinion of Ashhab, and a similar report exists from Mālik.

When a camel bolts and cannot be caught so that it may be ritually slaughtered—whether by the customary stab in the pit of the neck (nahr) or by cutting the throat between the throat and the upper chest—its meat is not lawful according to Mālik and his companions. The other scholars maintain that when a domesticated animal turns wild, flees, and cannot be subdued, it may be killed with the same weapons used for game.

If two men release two dogs and the dogs work together in killing the quarry, the game belongs to both hunters. If one dog reaches the vital organs and kills the animal before the other arrives, it belongs solely to the hunter whose dog made the kill.

If a man captures game and it then escapes from him

عن الصيد إلى جيفه رآها ثم اندفع بعد ذلك من قبل نفسه دون ان يشليه مرسله لم يجز أكل ما قتل إذا كان بعد حين وإذا كان عدوله يسيرا كضرب من طلبه للصيد لم يضره وإذا انفلت الكلب في طلب الصيد فأشلاه صاحبه بعد ذلك أو زجره فلا يأكل ما صاده. وقد قيل: إذا أشلاه بعد حروجه فانشلى وسمى عليه جاز أكل صيده والأول قول مالك ومن رأى شيئا يظنه خنزيرا أو سبعا فرمي على أنه خنزير فقتله فإذا هو صيد لم يؤكل ومن أخذ من أفواه الكلاب حيا من الصيد قد عقرته الكلاب فلم تدرك ذكاته من غير تقصير حتى مات فإنه يؤكل إلا أن يفرط في ذكاته فإنه لا يؤكل وما صيد بالسهم المسموم لم يؤكل إلا أن يكون السهم بذاته قتله وأنفذ مقاتله فإن أنفذ مقاتله السهم قبل أن يسري السم فيه جاز أكله إلا أنه يكره أكله خوفا من داء السم فإن أشكل أمره وجب الكف عنه ولا يؤكل إلا أن يصح أن السهم قتله دون السم وما لم تنب فيه الكلاب وتجرحه لم يؤكل وقد قيل يؤكل إذا مات من صدمة الكلب وإن لم ينب فيه ولم يجرحه وهو قول أشهب. وقد روي عن مالك ذلك وإذا ند البعير فلم يقدر على أخذه أو نحره أو ذبحه بين الحلق واللبة فيذكي لم يؤكل عند مالك وأصحابه وعند سائر أهل العلم إذا استوحش المستأنس وند وامتنع جاز قتله بما يجوز به قتل الصيد وإذا أرسل رجلان كلبين فاشتركا في قتل صيد كان بينهما وإذا نفذ أحدهما مقاتله قبل إدراك الآخر له فهو للأول الذي قتله دون الثاني. ولو أخذ رجل صيدا ثم افلت منه

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies