Al-KāfīIbn Abd al-Barr

the intention he had earlier no longer suffices. Even though he had framed it for fasting the whole of Ramadan at the outset, he must nevertheless renew his intention explicitly for the days that remain. Any continuous fast—such as the expiatory fast for ẓihār, the expiation for unintentional killing, the fast that expiates deliberate eating in Ramadan, or the fast of a full month or a set of consecutive days vowed to God—one single intention at the beginning is enough, according to Mālik; he need not renew it for every subsequent night.

The same applies to someone whose habit is to fast on Mondays and Thursdays, or the like. In sum, Mālik’s position is that any fast whose obligation is not tied to a specific time is invalid unless the intention is made during the night, whereas a fast whose obligation is linked to a particular time—and which a person regularly observes either before that time or the moment it begins—may be observed without an overnight intention.

In our view, articulating the intention overnight is required for both obligatory and voluntary fasts alike, as we have already stated to be the foundation of the school. Some of Mālik’s companions and other scholars of Medina maintain that an overnight intention is obligatory every night for every obligatory fast, whether one is travelling or resident. That opinion is also reported from Mālik, and his ruling on the person who falls into a coma lends it support, yet the first view remains the distilled doctrine of his school.

Whoever, during Ramadan, intends his fast merely as a supererogatory act gains no legal credit for it, whether he is travelling or at home. The same holds if he directs his intention to fulfilling a month’s fast he owes by vow: it discharges neither Ramadan nor the vow. Nothing other than the fast of Ramadan may be observed in Ramadan.

If someone still owes days from a previous Ramadan and delays making them up until the next Ramadan arrives, then observes this Ramadan intending it for that previous one, Mālik has three opinions:

  1. It counts for the current Ramadan, and he must still make up the earlier one.
  2. It counts for the earlier Ramadan, and he must make up the current one.
  3. It counts for neither, and he must
قد عقدها لصوم رمضان في أوله ويلزمه أن يجرد النية لما بقي منه وكل صوم متصل مثل صيام الظهار أو كفارة القتل أو صيام كفارة الفطر عمدا في رمضان أو صيام شهر أو أيام متتابعة في نذر فتجزئه النية في أول ذلك كله دون تجديد نية لكل ليلة منه عند مالك. وكذلك من كانت عادته صوم يوم الاثنين والخميس ونحو ذلك وجملة مذهبه أن مالم يكن معينا وجوبه من الصيام لم يصح إلا بنية من الليل وما كان وجوبه في وقت بعينه وكان يعمله قبل وقته أو بدخول وقته صام واستغنى عن التبييت. والتبييت عندنا في الفريضة والنافلة سواء على حسب ما قدمنا من أصل المذهب ومن أصحاب مالك وأهل المدينة من يرى التبييت واجبا في كل ليلة من كل سفر واجب في السفر والحضر وقد روي ذلك أيضا عن مالك وقول مالك في المغمى عليه يقضي بصحة هذه الرواية عنه والأول تحصيل مذهبه. ومن نوى بصوم رمضان التطوع لم يجزه مسافرا كان أو حاضرا وكذلك لو نواه عن صيام شهر عليه نذرا لم يجزه عن رمضان ولا عن نذره ولا يصام في رمضان غيره ومن كان عليه قضاء رمضان فلم يقضه حتى دخل رمضان آخر فصام هذا عن ذلك ففيها لمالك ثلاثة أقوال: أحدها: أنه يجزئه عن هذا وعليه قضاء ذلك. والآخر: أنه عن ذلك وعليه قضاء هذا. والثالث: أنه لا يجزئه عن واحد منهما، وعليه

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies