Al-KāfīIbn Abd al-Barr

there until his repentance becomes evident. All of this, Malik maintained.

A group of scholars from Medina, however, hold that he should be exiled without interruption, passed from one town to the next until he is finally seized and the prescribed penalty—execution, crucifixion, or the amputation of his right hand and left foot—is carried out.

These are the rulings for anyone who spreads corruption on earth by terrorizing travelers, even if he has shed no blood. Should he kill, he is killed in retaliation for the life he took; none of the victim’s heirs may pardon him.

Once these ḥudūd have been enforced, the highwaymen bear no further liability for what they have consumed, unless they are solvent—in which case they are treated exactly like thieves. Whatever property is found in their possession is returned to its rightful owner.

If they repent before the authorities overpower them, the discretionary penalties in which the ruler may choose are waived. Retaliation (qiṣāṣ) nevertheless remains due to anyone whose relative was slain, and here the heir is free to pardon them. In addition, they must reimburse whatever wealth they have taken from people, for human claims do not fall away; payment is binding on them in hardship and in ease alike.

Any Muslim property the ruler recovers from the highwaymen must be safeguarded and publicly announced. Whoever comes forward with an accurate description and identifying marks acceptable to the ruler is to swear an oath, after which the property is returned to him. If the claimant is a local resident, it is advisable for the ruler to take a guarantee equivalent to what he receives, lest someone with a stronger claim appear later. A stranger, however, is not burdened with such a guarantee; once he has sworn, his goods are handed over to him.

Whoever kills another person for his wealth—whether at home or on a journey, on land or sea, in safety or in fear—incurs the same ruling as a highwayman. According to Malik, the ruler has discretion with regard to him exactly as described above, whether the slain was Muslim or non-Muslim, slave or free; for anyone who kills a slave or a non-Muslim during his highway robbery is executed for the corruption he has wrought on earth.

And whoever administers a narcotic or poison in—

هناك حتى تظهر توبته هذا كله قول مالك ومن أهل المدينة جماعة يرون ان نفيه تباعا أبدا من بلد الى بلد حتى يؤخذ ويقام عليه الحد بالقتل أو الصلب أو قطع اليد والرجل من خلاف هذه أحكام من سعى في الأرض بأخافه السبل وان لم يقتل وأما إن قتل فإنه يقتل بمن قتل لا يجوز فيه عفو لأحد من أولياء المقتول ولا تبعة على المحاربين فيما استهلكوا بعد إقامة هذه الحدود عليهم إلا أن يكونوا موسرين كالسراق سواء وما وجد بأيديهم صرف الى ربه فإن تابوا من قبل المقدرة عليهم سقط عنهم ما ذكرنا من الحدود التي كان السلطان فيها مخيرا وثبت عليهم القصاص لمن ثبت له بقتل وليه ويجوز عفو الولي هاهنا عنهم وهاهنا عليهم غرم ما أخذوه من أموال الناس لأن حقوق الآدميين غير ساقطة عنهم يلزمهم ذلك في العسر واليسر وعلى الإمام فيما وجده بأيدي المحاربين من أموال المسلمين ان يحرزها ويشهر ذكرها فمن جاء فيها بصفة وعلامة تلوم في امره ثم أحلفه ودفع ذلك إليه وإن لم يكن غريبا فحسن أن يأخذ منه بما دفع إليه ضامنا لئلا يستحقه غيره بأقوى من سببه ولا يكلف الغريب جميلا في ذلك فيقطع به وإذا حلف دفع إليه متاعه وكل من قتل أحدا على ماله في حضر أو سفر أو بر أو بحر أو مأمن أو خوف فحكمه حكم المحارب سواء والامام مخير فيه عند مالك على ما ذكرنا عنه وسواء كان المقتول مسلما أو كافرا عبدا أو حرا لأن من قتل في حرابته عبدا او كافرا قتل به لفساده في الأرض ومن سقى البنج أو السم في

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies