He has conveyed in His Book: in a manner befitting His majesty. We neither over-analyse nor affect clever cleverness; we do not wade into the logical consequences of that, whether in negation or affirmation. Rather, we remain silent and stop where the early Muslims stopped. We know that had there been any alternate interpretation, the Companions and the Followers would have hastened to clarify it; it would not have been permissible for them merely to transmit it, approve it, and keep silent. At the same time, we are absolutely certain that Allah—glorified and exalted—is without peer in His attributes, in His rising, or in His descending. Highly exalted is He above what the wrongdoers allege.
112– Al-Dārimī recorded this in “Refutation of the Jahmiyyah” (p. 33), and al-Lālakāʾī (1/92/1) with the wording just cited. As for the wording attributed to him by the author of “The Criterion between the Creator’s Attributes and the Attributes of Created Things” (p. 16): “The rising is mentioned,” I have not found it in his book, nor have I seen anyone else quote it apart from the person indicated. He is trustworthy, and for that reason he relied on that wording, because it supports his aim of denying the meaning of rising and claiming that it was already well known to Mālik!
133– Indeed, the jurist Abū Thawr al-Kalbī said: I heard al-Shāfiʿī say: Whenever someone from the people of whims came to Mālik, he would say, “I am upon clear proof regarding my religion, whereas you are in doubt; so go debate a doubter like yourself.”
134– Al-Walīd ibn Muslim said: I asked al-Awzāʿī, Mālik ibn Anas, Sufyān al-Thawrī, and al-Layth ibn Saʿd about the ḥadiths that mention the divine attributes. All of them answered, “Let them pass exactly as they have come, without interpretation.”¹
This was transmitted by a group from al-Haytham ibn Khārija on his authority.
113– I say: Its chain is sound; every transmitter in it is reliable. The compiler has declared it authentic in “The Forty Ḥadiths,” in the following entry, through his own chain to al-Dāraqutnī, which goes back to al-Haytham. Ibn Mandah also related it in “Kitāb al-Tawḥīd” (96/2) and al-Ṣābūnī in “ʿAqīdat al-Salaf” (1/120, al-Munīriyyah edition).
135– Ibn Abī Uways said: I heard Mālik say: