Majmu' al-FatawaIbn Taimiya

And they agree that this Sufyān ibn Husayn makes errors in what he narrates from al-Zuhrī, and that reports he alone transmits cannot be relied upon as evidence. The use of a muhallil in racing has no basis in Islamic law, and the Prophet, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, did not instruct his community to use one. It is reported that Abū ‘Ubaydah ibn al-Jarrāh and others used to race for stakes without introducing a muhallil among them.

Those jurists who advocated this thought that it would otherwise constitute gambling. Some of them then maintained that introducing a muhallil removes its resemblance to gambling. Yet matters are not as they claim. Rather, introducing a muhallil involves … (1) risk-taking. Moreover, the arrangement is unjust: if the muhallil wins, he takes the prize, but if he loses, he pays nothing, whereas another contestant is given the prize if he wins. Introducing a muhallil is thus an injustice that Islamic law would not sanction.

This matter is discussed at length elsewhere. And Allah knows best.

(1) A blank in the original. Shaykh Nāsir ibn Hamad al-Fahd states (pp. 151–152): “The wording in al-Kubrā, 1/495, is: ‘… rather, introducing a muhallil (a non-staking entrant) [leads to] risk-taking …’ This, or something to the same effect, is probably the correct reading. And Allah knows best.”
وَهُمْ مُتَّفِقُونَ عَلَى أَنَّ سُفْيَانَ بْنَ حُسَيْنٍ هَذَا يَغْلَطُ فِيمَا يَرْوِيه عَنْ الزُّهْرِيِّ وَأَنَّهُ لَا يَحْتَجُّ بِمَا يَنْفَرِدُ بِهِ وَمُحَلِّلُ السِّبَاق لَا أَصْلَ لَهُ فِي الشَّرِيعَةِ وَلَمْ يَأْمُرْ النَّبِيُّ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ أُمَّتَهُ بِمُحَلِّلِ السِّبَاقِ وَقَدْ رَوَى عَنْ أَبِي عُبَيْدَةَ بْنِ الْجَرَّاحِ وَغَيْرِهِ: أَنَّهُمْ كَانُوا يَتَسَابَقُونَ بِجُعْلِ وَلَا يُدْخِلُونَ بَيْنَهُمْ مُحَلِّلًا وَاَلَّذِينَ قَالُوا: هَذَا مِنْ الْفُقَهَاءِ ظَنُّوا أَنَّهُ يَكُونُ قِمَارًا ثُمَّ مِنْهُمْ مَنْ قَالَ بِالْمُحَلِّلِ يَخْرُجُ عَنْ شَبَهِ الْقِمَارِ وَلَيْسَ الْأَمْرُ كَمَا قَالُوهُ بَلْ بِالْمُحَلِّلِ مِنْ. . . (١) الْمُخَاطَرَةِ وَفِي الْمُحَلِّلِ ظُلْمٌ لِأَنَّهُ إذَا سَبَقَ أَخَذَ؛ وَإِذَا سَبَقَ لَمْ يُعْطَ وَغَيْرُهُ إذَا سَبَقَ أُعْطِيَ فَدُخُولُ الْمُحَلِّلِ ظُلْمٌ لَا تَأْتِي بِهِ الشَّرِيعَةُ. وَالْكَلَامُ عَلَى هَذَا مَبْسُوطٌ فِي مَوَاضِعَ أُخَرَ وَاَللَّهِ أَعْلَمُ.
(١) بياض بالأصل قال الشيخ ناصر بن حمد الفهد (ص ١٥١ - ١٥٢): والعبارة كما في (الكبرى) ١/ ٤٩٥ (. . .، بل بالمحلل [مؤد إلى] المخاطرة. . .)، ولعله الصواب أو ما في معناه، والله أعلم.

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies