Majmu' al-FatawaIbn Taimiya

is commonly attributed to the Peripatetics. Rather, they maintained that there was no proof ruling out a greater number. Seeing that prophetic revelations had spoken of the multitude of angels, they sought to establish their multitude through a philosophical method, as did Abū al-Barakāt, author of al-Mu'tabar, and al-Rāzī in al-Matālib al-'Āliyah, among others.

As for the speculative theologians, they say that every contingent thing, everything that has come into being, or every created thing either occupies space or subsists in something that occupies space. Many of them say that every existent either occupies space or subsists in something that occupies space, and that no existent can be conceived otherwise. Various groups engaged in speculative theology and rational inquiry have maintained this.

When philosophically inclined thinkers such as Ibn Sīnā and his followers, al-Shahrastānī, al-Rāzī, and others sought to establish the existence of something that is not of this kind, their principal support was their affirmation of universals, such as shared humanity and shared animality. Since these are universals only in the mind, their opponents did not dispute this with them. Rather, they disputed their affirmation of something existing outside the mind, subsisting in itself, yet entirely imperceptible to the senses—indeed, something that cannot even be conceived.

They said to them: “What is intellectually apprehended is in the intellect. But whatever exists and subsists in itself must be capable of being perceived by the senses, even if we do not perceive it in this world, just as we do not perceive the jinn, the angels, and other such beings. It must therefore be perceptible to beings other than ourselves, such as the angels and jinn, and be perceived after death, or in the Hereafter, or

هُوَ الْمَشْهُورُ عَنْ الْمَشَّائِينَ بَلْ قَالَ: لَا دَلِيلَ عَلَى نَفْيِ الزِّيَادَةِ وَرَأَى النُّبُوَّاتِ قَدْ أَخْبَرَتْ بِكَثْرَةِ الْمَلَائِكَةِ فَأَرَادَ أَنْ يُثْبِتَ كَثْرَتَهُمْ بِطَرِيقَةٍ فَلْسَفِيَّةٍ كَمَا فَعَلَ ذَلِكَ أَبُو الْبَرَكَاتِ صَاحِبُ " الْمُعْتَبَرِ " وَالرَّازِي فِي " الْمَطَالِبِ الْعَالِيَةِ " وَغَيْرِهِمَا. وَأَمَّا الْمُتَكَلِّمُونَ فَإِنَّهُمْ يَقُولُونَ: إنَّ كُلَّ مُمْكِنٍ أَوْ كُلَّ مُحْدَثٍ أَوْ كُلَّ مَخْلُوقٍ: فَهُوَ إمَّا مُتَحَيِّزٌ وَإِمَّا قَائِمٌ بِمُتَحَيِّزِ وَكَثِيرٌ مِنْهُمْ يَقُولُ: كُلُّ مَوْجُودٍ إمَّا مُتَحَيِّزٌ وَإِمَّا قَائِمٌ بِمُتَحَيِّزِ وَيَقُولُونَ: لَا يُعْقَل مَوْجُودٌ إلَّا كَذَلِكَ كَمَا قَالَهُ طَوَائِفُ مِنْ أَهْلِ الْكَلَامِ وَالنَّظَرِ ثُمَّ الْمُتَفَلْسِفَةُ كَابْنِ سِينَا وَأَتْبَاعِهِ وَالشِّهْرِسْتَانِي وَالرَّازِي وَغَيْرِهِمْ لَمَّا أَرَادُوا إثْبَاتَ مَوْجُودٍ لَيْسَ كَذَلِكَ كَانَ أَكْبَرُ عُمْدَتِهِمْ إثْبَاتَ الْكُلِّيَّاتِ كالإنسانية الْمُشْتَرِكَةِ والحيوانية الْمُشْتَرِكَةِ وَإِذَا كَانَتْ هَذِهِ لَا تَكُونُ كُلِّيَّاتٍ إلَّا فِي الذِّهْنِ فَلَمْ يُنَازِعْهُمْ النَّاسُ فِي ذَلِكَ وَإِنَّمَا نَازَعُوهُمْ فِي إثْبَاتِ مَوْجُودٍ خَارِجَ الذِّهْنِ قَائِمٍ بِنَفْسِهِ لَا يُمْكِنُ الْإِحْسَاسُ بِهِ بِحَالِ بَلْ لَا يَكُونُ مَعْقُولًا. وَقَالُوا لَهُمْ: الْمَعْقُولُ مَا كَانَ فِي الْعَقْلِ وَأَمَّا مَا كَانَ مَوْجُودًا قَائِمًا بِنَفْسِهِ فَلَا بُدَّ أَنْ يُمْكِنَ الْإِحْسَاسُ بِهِ وَإِنْ لَمْ نُحِسَّ نَحْنُ بِهِ فِي الدُّنْيَا كَمَا لَا نُحِسُّ بِالْجِنِّ وَالْمَلَائِكَةِ وَغَيْرِ ذَلِكَ فَلَا بُدَّ أَنْ يُحِسَّ بِهِ غَيْرُنَا كَالْمَلَائِكَةِ وَالْجِنِّ وَأَنْ يُحِسَّ بِهِ بَعْدَ الْمَوْتِ أَوْ فِي الدَّارِ الْآخِرَةِ أَوْ

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies