and give each its due. “Ibn ‘Atiyya’s Commentary” is better than al-Zamakhsharī’s, more reliable in its transmission of reports and its analysis, and further removed from religious innovations, although it contains some of them. Indeed, it is far better; it may even be the strongest of these commentaries. Yet Ibn Jarīr’s commentary is sounder than all of these. There are very many other commentaries, such as those of Ibn al-Jawzī and al-Māwardī.