Section
As for the second of the two bases of disagreement—what is known through inference rather than transmission—most errors in this area arise from two sources. These emerged after the Quranic interpretations of the Companions, the Successors, and those who followed them in righteousness. Commentaries that contain exclusively their statements scarcely contain anything of these two kinds. Examples include the commentaries of ‘Abd al-Razzāq, Wakī‘, ‘Abd ibn Humayd, ‘Abd al-Rahmān ibn Ibrāhīm Duhaym, Imam Ahmad, Ishāq ibn Rāhawayh, Baqī ibn Makhlad, Abū Bakr ibn al-Mundhir, Sufyān ibn ‘Uyaynah, Sunayd, Ibn Jarīr, Ibn Abī Hātim, Abū Sa‘īd al-Ashajj, Abū ‘Abd Allāh ibn Mājah, and Ibn Mardawayh.
“The first” consists of people who adopted certain meanings and then sought to make the wording of the Quran conform to them.
“The second” consists of people who interpreted the Quran solely according to meanings that an Arabic speaker could conceivably intend by his words, without considering the One who spoke the Quran, the one to whom it was revealed, or those addressed by it.
“The former” attended to the meaning they had adopted without considering what the wording of the Quran itself signifies and makes clear.