Majmu' al-FatawaIbn Taimiya

transmitted through his son ʿAbd Allāh from a written text he found (1). Al-Khallāl also included it in his Kitāb al-Sunnah, and Judge Abū Yaʿlā and others quoted from it. Several scholars have reported universal consensus on this, including Abū Nasr al-Sijzī in al-Ibānah, despite his being among the strongest critics of anyone who says that people’s utterances of the Quran are created, or that what is heard from the reciter is not the Quran.

Abū Nasr said:
“As for attributing voices to reciters—as we have done in this chapter and elsewhere in this book—and attributing recitation to them, although those who deviate may rejoice at this, it provides them with no proof. For we have never disagreed about attributing a voice to a person, or about his voice being created when he shouts, speaks human speech, or calls out to someone.”

He said:
“There is no ambiguity about this. The disagreement concerns only what a person listening to a reciter of the Quran actually hears.”

He continued the discussion to its conclusion. Elsewhere, he also mentioned consensus on this.

Section

I have drawn attention to the fundamental position of Imam Ahmad and the other imams of the Sunnah and scholars of hadith concerning the question of our recitation of the Quran only because it lies at the root of the confusion

(1) The printed edition reads “wahādah.” The compiler—may Allah have mercy on him—commented in the margin: “Thus in the original.” Shaykh Nāsir ibn Hamad al-Fahd states (p. 109): “This is a textual corruption; the correct reading is wijāda (transmission from a discovered written text), one of the methods of receiving reports. The shaykh—may Allah have mercy on him—mentioned this in several places, including al-Dar’, 2:116: ‘Al-Khallāl said: Al-Khidr ibn Ahmad al-Muthannā al-Kindī informed us: I heard ‘Abd Allāh ibn Ahmad ibn Hanbal say: “I found this book in my father’s handwriting among the material he used as evidence against the Jahmiyya.”’”
مَرْوِيٌّ مِنْ طَرِيقِ ابْنِهِ عَبْدِ اللَّهِ وَجَادَةً (١) . وَقَدْ ذَكَرَهُ الْخَلَّالُ أَيْضًا فِي " كِتَابِ السُّنَّةِ " وَنَقَلَ مِنْهُ الْقَاضِي أَبُو يَعْلَى وَغَيْرُهُ وَقَدْ حَكَى إجْمَاعَ الْخَلْقِ عَلَى ذَلِكَ غَيْرُ وَاحِدٍ مِنْهُمْ أَبُو نَصْرٍ السجزي فِي " الْإِبَانَةِ " وَهُوَ مَنْ أَشَدِّ النَّاسِ إنْكَارًا عَلَى مَنْ يَقُولُ: إنَّ أَلْفَاظَ الْعِبَادِ بِالْقُرْآنِ مَخْلُوقَةٌ أَوْ يَقُولُ: إنَّ الْمَسْمُوعَ مِنْ الْقَارِئِ لَيْسَ هُوَ الْقُرْآنَ. قَالَ أَبُو نَصْرٍ: وَأَمَّا نِسْبَةُ الْأَصْوَاتِ إلَى الْقُرَّاءِ - فِيمَا ذَكَرْنَا فِي هَذَا الْبَابِ وَفِي غَيْرِهِ مِنْ كِتَابِنَا هَذَا - وَنِسْبَةُ الْقِرَاءَةِ إلَيْهِمْ وَإِنْ فَرِحَ بِهَا الزَّائِغُونَ فَلَا حُجَّةَ لَهُمْ فِيهَا؛ وَذَلِكَ أَنَّا لَمْ نَخْتَلِفْ فِي إضَافَةِ الصَّوْتِ إلَى الْإِنْسَانِ وَأَنَّهُ إذَا صَاحَ أَوْ تَكَلَّمَ بِكَلَامِ النَّاسِ أَوْ نَادَى إنْسَانًا فَصَوْتُهُ مَخْلُوقٌ. قَالَ: وَهَذَا لَا يَشْتَبِهُ: وَإِنَّمَا وَقَعَ الِاخْتِلَافُ فِي أَنَّ الْمُسْتَمِعَ مِنْ قَارِئِ الْقُرْآنِ مَاذَا يَسْتَمِعُ؟ وَسَاقَ الْكَلَامَ إلَى آخِرِهِ. وَذَكَرَ فِي مَوْضِعٍ آخَرَ " الْإِجْمَاعَ " أَيْضًا عَلَى ذَلِكَ. فَصْلٌ: وَإِنَّمَا نَبَّهْت عَلَى أَصْلِ مَقَالَةِ الْإِمَامِ أَحْمَد وَسَائِر أَئِمَّةِ السُّنَّةِ وَأَهْلِ الْحَدِيثِ فِي " مَسْأَلَةِ تِلَاوَتِنَا لِلْقُرْآنِ " لِأَنَّهَا أَصْلُ مَا وَقَعَ مِنْ الِاضْطِرَابِ
(١) في المطبوع: وحاده، وعلق الجامع رحمه الله في الحاشية: كذا بالأصل قال الشيخ ناصر بن حمد الفهد (ص ١٠٩): وهو تصحيف صوابه: (وجادة)، وهي من طرق التحمل في الرواية، وقد ذكر هذا الشيخ رحمه الله في غير موضع كما قال في (الدرء) ٢/ ١١٦ (وقال الخلال: أنبأنا الخضر بن أحمد المثنى الكندي: سمعت عبد الله بن أحمد بن حنبل قال: وجدت هذا الكتاب بخط أبي فيما احتج به على الجهمية)

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies