Majmu' al-FatawaIbn Taimiya

And most rational people—both adherents of the Sunnah and adherents of religious innovation—hold that the falsity of this position is self-evident. Likewise, they consider it self-evidently false to claim that the sounds heard from human beings are eternal, or that a speaker speaks by virtue of speech subsisting in someone else, a knower knows by virtue of knowledge subsisting in someone else, or a powerful being possesses power by virtue of power subsisting in someone else.

Most rational people likewise consider it self-evidently false to claim that knowledge is power, that power is will, that knowledge is identical to the knower, or that power is identical to the possessor of power.

The fourth position:

This is the position of groups of speculative theologians and hadith scholars, including the Sālimiyya and others. They maintain that Allah’s speech consists of eternal, beginningless letters and sounds, which nevertheless have meanings subsisting in the speaker’s essence. They agree with the Ash‘arīs and Kullābīs that Allah’s speaking to His servants amounts merely to creating a perception of the speaker, rather than being something separate from the listener.

Most of them, however, do not maintain that those sounds are the ones heard from reciters; rather, they distinguish between the two. Among them is a group—the people of . . . (1)

(1) A blank in the original. Shaykh Nāsir ibn Hamad al-Fahd stated (p. 104): The shaykh discussed this issue in several places in his works and attributed this view in (6:309–310) to “a group of hadith scholars, jurists, and Sufis among the followers of al-Shāfi‘ī and Ahmad ibn Hanbal.” Perhaps this passage, or something similar, belongs in the blank. Allah knows best.
وَجُمْهُورُ الْعُقَلَاءِ - مِنْ أَهْلِ السُّنَّةِ وَأَهْلِ الْبِدْعَةِ - يَقُولُونَ إنَّ فَسَادَ هَذَا الْقَوْلِ مَعْلُومٌ بِالضَّرُورَةِ كَمَا يَقُولُونَ: إنَّ فَسَادَ قَوْلِ مَنْ يَقُولُ: إنَّ الْأَصْوَاتَ الْمَسْمُوعَةَ مِنْ الْعِبَادِ قَدِيمَةٌ مَعْلُومٌ بِالضَّرُورَةِ كَمَا يَقُولُونَ: إنَّ فَسَادَ قَوْلِ مَنْ يَقُولُ إنَّ الْمُتَكَلِّمَ يَكُونُ مُتَكَلِّمًا بِكَلَامِ يَقُومُ بِغَيْرِهِ وَإِنَّ الْعَالِمَ يَكُونُ عَالِمًا بِعِلْمِ يَقُومُ بِغَيْرِهِ وَالْقَادِرَ يَكُونُ قَادِرًا بِقُدْرَةِ تَقُومُ بِغَيْرِهِ مَعْلُومٌ بِالضَّرُورَةِ. وَكَمَا يَقُولُ جُمْهُورُ الْعُقَلَاءِ: إنَّ فَسَادَ قَوْلِ مَنْ يَقُولُ: إنَّ الْعِلْمَ هُوَ الْقُدْرَةُ وَالْقُدْرَةُ هِيَ الْإِرَادَةُ وَإِنَّ الْعِلْمَ هُوَ الْعَالِمُ وَالْقُدْرَةَ هِيَ الْقَادِرُ مَعْلُومٌ بِالضَّرُورَةِ. الْقَوْلُ الرَّابِعُ: قَوْلُ طَوَائِفَ مِنْ أَهْلِ الْكَلَامِ وَالْحَدِيثِ مِنْ السالمية وَغَيْرِهِمْ يَقُولُونَ: إنَّ كَلَامَ اللَّهِ حُرُوفٌ وَأَصْوَاتٌ قَدِيمَةٌ أَزَلِيَّةٌ وَلَهَا مَعَ ذَلِكَ مَعَانٍ تَقُومُ بِذَاتِ الْمُتَكَلِّمِ وَهَؤُلَاءِ يُوَافِقُونَ الْأَشْعَرِيَّةَ والْكُلَّابِيَة فِي أَنَّ تَكْلِيمَ اللَّهِ لِعِبَادِهِ لَيْسَ إلَّا مُجَرَّدَ خَلْقِ إدْرَاكٍ لِلْمُتَكَلِّمِ لَيْسَ هُوَ أَمْرًا مُنْفَصِلًا عَنْ الْمُسْتَمِعِ. ثُمَّ إنَّ جُمْهُورَ هَؤُلَاءِ لَا يَقُولُونَ إنَّ تِلْكَ الْأَصْوَاتَ هِيَ الْمَسْمُوعَةُ مِنْ الْقَارِئِينَ بَلْ يُفَرِّقُونَ بَيْنَ هَذَا وَهَذَا. وَمِنْهُمْ طَائِفَةٌ وَهُمْ أَهْلُ. . . (١)
(١) بياض بالأصل قال الشيخ ناصر بن حمد الفهد (ص ١٠٤): وقد ذكر الشيخ هذه المسألة في مواضع من كتبه، ونسب هذا القول في (٦/ ٣٠٩، ٣١٠) إلى (طائفة من أهل الحديث والفقه والتصوف، من أصحاب الشافعي وأحمد بن حنبل)، فلعل هذا النص أو نحوه هو موضع البياض، والله أعلم

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies