Majmu' al-FatawaIbn Taimiya

is what is called Allah’s speech, or its counterpart is found in what is called Allah’s speech; therefore, Allah’s speech is created.”

The advocate of indwelling and union, who identifies the Creator’s attribute with the creature’s attribute, said: “What we hear from the reciters is Allah’s speech, yet we hear only the servants’ voices. Thus, the servants’ voices reciting the Quran are Allah’s speech. Allah’s speech is uncreated; therefore, the servants’ voices reciting the Quran are uncreated, and the letters heard from them are uncreated.” They then said: “The letters occurring in their speech are these very letters, or their counterparts; therefore, they are uncreated.” Some of their extremists went further, declaring the sounds of their ordinary speech uncreated. Similarly, some of them claimed that deeds are part of faith, that faith is uncreated, and that deeds are therefore uncreated.

Some extended this to both good and evil deeds, saying: “They are divine decree and prescribed law.” [And Umar said: “By deeds, we do not mean movements, but rather the reward that comes on the Day of Resurrection, as mentioned in the authentic hadith: ‘Al-Baqarah and Āl Imrān will come as though they were two clouds, or two canopies of shade, or two flocks of birds with wings outspread.’” He is to be told: “This reward, too, is created.” Ahmad and other imams explicitly stated that it is uncreated.] (*)

This was also their answer to anyone who cited such a hadith as evidence that the Quran is created. They told him: “What comes on the Day of Resurrection is the reward for the Quran, not the Quran itself, and the reward for the Quran is created.” These are among the many such statements introduced by various groups. Innovations arise little by little. This subject has been discussed at length elsewhere.

(*) Shaykh Nāsir ibn Hamad al-Fahd stated (p. 103): There are two points here: First: His statement, “And Umar said: ‘By deeds we do not mean …’” appears to me to contain a scribal error. Perhaps the correct reading is “And another said,” or something similar, since he mentions this view repeatedly without attributing it to anyone (1). Second: His statement, “Ahmad and other imams explicitly stated that it is created,” refers to the reward. Thus, the word ghayr (“not”) was inadvertently inserted by the copyist. The shaykh discusses this elsewhere, saying (8/408): “This contradicts the explicit statements of all the imams of Islam, including Imam Ahmad. He and other imams explicitly stated that the reward Allah grants for reciting the Quran is created. How much more so, then, the reward He grants for the rest of His servants’ deeds.” (1) See, for example, al-Fatāwā, 7/661 and 8/408.
هُوَ الْمُسَمَّى بِكَلَامِ اللَّهِ أَوْ يُوجَدُ نَظِيرُهُ فِي الْمُسَمَّى بِكَلَامِ اللَّهِ فَيَكُونُ كَلَامُ اللَّهِ مَخْلُوقًا. وَقَالَ الْحُلُولِيُّ الِاتِّحَادِيُّ الَّذِي يَجْعَلُ صِفَةَ الْخَالِقِ هِيَ عَيْنَ صِفَةِ الْمَخْلُوقِ الَّذِي: نَسْمَعُهُ مِنْ الْقُرَّاءِ هُوَ كَلَامُ اللَّهِ وَإِنَّمَا نَسْمَعُ أَصْوَاتَ الْعِبَادِ فَأَصْوَاتُ الْعِبَادِ بِالْقُرْآنِ كَلَامُ اللَّهِ وَكَلَامُ اللَّهِ غَيْرُ مَخْلُوقٍ فَأَصْوَاتُ الْعِبَادِ بِالْقُرْآنِ غَيْرُ مَخْلُوقَةٍ وَالْحُرُوفُ الْمَسْمُوعَةُ مِنْهُمْ غَيْرُ مَخْلُوقَةٍ ثُمَّ قَالُوا: الْحُرُوفُ الْمَوْجُودَةُ فِي كَلَامِهِمْ هِيَ هَذِهِ أَوْ مِثْلُ هَذِهِ فَتَكُونُ غَيْرَ مَخْلُوقَةٍ. وَزَادَ بَعْضُ غُلَاتِهِمْ فَجَعَلَ أَصْوَاتَ كَلَامِهِمْ غَيْرَ مَخْلُوقَةٍ كَمَا زَعَمَ بَعْضُهُمْ أَنَّ الْأَعْمَالَ مِنْ الْإِيمَانِ وَهُوَ غَيْرُ مَخْلُوقٍ وَالْأَعْمَالُ غَيْرُ مَخْلُوقَةٍ. وَزَادَ بَعْضُهُمْ أَعْمَالَ الْخَيْرِ وَالشَّرِّ وَقَالَ: هِيَ الْقَدَرُ وَالشَّرْعُ الْمَشْرُوعُ [وَقَالَ عُمَرُ: مَا مُرَادُنَا بِالْأَعْمَالِ الْحَرَكَاتُ بَلْ الثَّوَابُ الَّذِي يَأْتِي يَوْمَ الْقِيَامَةِ كَمَا وَرَدَ فِي الْحَدِيثِ الصَّحِيحِ: " {أَنَّهُ تَأْتِي الْبَقَرَةُ وَآلُ عِمْرَانَ كَأَنَّهُمَا غَمَامَتَانِ أَوْ غَيَايَتَانِ أَوْ فِرْقَانِ مِنْ الطَّيْرِ صَوَافُّ} فَيُقَالُ لَهُ: وَهَذَا الثَّوَابُ مَخْلُوقٌ. وَقَدْ نَصَّ أَحْمَد وَغَيْرُهُ مِنْ الْأَئِمَّةِ عَلَى أَنَّهُ غَيْرُ مَخْلُوقٍ] (*) وَبِذَلِكَ أَجَابُوا مَنْ احْتَجَّ عَلَى خَلْقِ الْقُرْآنِ بِمِثْلِ هَذَا الْحَدِيثِ فَقَالُوا لَهُ: الَّذِي يَجِيءُ يَوْمَ الْقِيَامَةِ هُوَ ثَوَابُ الْقُرْآنِ لَا نَفْسُ الْقُرْآنِ وَثَوَابُ الْقُرْآنِ مَخْلُوقٌ إلَى أَمْثَالِ هَذِهِ الْأَقْوَالِ الَّتِي ابْتَدَعَهَا طَوَائِفُ وَالْبِدَعُ تَنْشَأُ شَيْئًا فَشَيْئًا وَقَدْ بُسِطَ الْكَلَامُ فِي هَذَا الْبَابِ فِي مَوَاضِعَ أُخَرَ.
(*) قال الشيخ ناصر بن حمد الفهد (ص ١٠٣): هنا أمران: الأول: قوله (وقال عمر: ما مرادنا بالأعمال. . .) يظهر لي أنه مصحف، ولعل صوابه (وقال آخر) أو نحو ذلك، فإنه ذكر هذا القول مراراً ولم ينسبه لأحد (١). والثاني: قوله (وقد نص أحمد وغيره من الأئمة على أنه مخلوق)، والكلام عائد على الثواب، فتكون كلمة (غير) مقحمة سهوا من الناسخ. وقد ذكر الشيخ هذا الأمر في موضع آخر فقال (٨/ ٤٠٨): (وهو مخالف لنصوص أئمة الإسلام كلهم، وأحدهم الإمام أحمد، فإنه نص هو وغيره من الأئمة على أن الثواب الذي يعطيه الله على قراءة القرآن مخلوق. فكيف بالثواب الذي يعطيه على سائر أعمال العباد). (١) انظر مثلا (الفتاوى) ٧/ ٦٦١، ٨/ ٤٠٨.

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies