Majmu' al-FatawaIbn Taimiya

The second basis is that the designation, when used without qualification, implies completeness, which the speaker cannot know he possesses. Thus,

[Abū al-‘Āliyah said: “I met thirty of Muhammad’s Companions, all of whom feared hypocrisy for themselves. Not one would say, ‘My faith is like Gabriel’s faith.’”] (1)

For a man to declare that his faith is complete is to make a claim about something he does not know. This is the meaning of Ibn al-Munazzil’s statement: “The Murji’ah say that their good deeds are accepted, whereas I do not testify to that.” This reasoning can support making qualification obligatory. It is also al-Qādī’s second basis: his opponent argued that, since qualifying one’s profession of Islam is impermissible, the same must apply to faith.

He replied: “The answer is that Islam consists simply of the two testimonies of faith, which he has pronounced, whereas faith comprises words and deeds, as indicated by the saying, ‘Faith has seventy-odd aspects.’ He cannot be certain that he has fulfilled them all.”

The third basis is that such a claim amounts to praising oneself, whereas Allah has said:

“So do not claim purity for yourselves.”

This can support recommending qualification; otherwise, a person may lawfully describe himself as he actually is, even if this entails praise. It may also support making qualification obligatory.

Al-Athram said in al-Sunnah: “Ahmad ibn Hanbal narrated to us: ‘I heard Yahyā ibn Sa‘īd say: “Everyone among our companions whom I met or heard about qualified his profession of faith.”’” Al-Athram said: “I heard Abū ‘Abd Allāh being asked about qualifying one’s profession of faith: ‘What is your view of it?’ He replied: ‘As for me, I do not disapprove of it… (2) I qualify it out of fear and caution, not out of doubt, as they claim. Qualification concerns only deeds.’”

Abū ‘Abd Allāh said: “Allah has said:

‘You will surely enter the Sacred Mosque, if Allah wills.’”

That is, this qualification does not express doubt. The Prophet also said

(1) Shaykh Nāsir ibn Hamad al-Fahd stated (p. 66): This report is a statement of Ibn Abī Mulayka, as cited by al-Bukhārī in mu‘allaq form (with a suspended chain of transmission). The shaykh—may Allah have mercy on him—mentions it repeatedly and attributes it to Ibn Abī Mulayka. Indeed, he quotes it from him in this volume both before and after this passage (pp. 470, 681). I suspect that the reading here is a scribal error, since this page also contains an omission, as noted in the following paragraph. Allah knows best. (2) Approximately half a line is missing from the original. Shaykh Nāsir ibn Hamad al-Fahd stated (p. 67): Imam Ahmad’s complete statement, as transmitted by al-Athram, reads: “As for me, I do not disapprove of it, provided that he says, ‘Faith consists of words and deeds, increases and decreases,’ and qualifies his profession of faith out of fear and caution—not out of doubt, as they claim. Rather, qualification concerns deeds.” This has already been quoted in full in this volume: 7:254–255.
وَالْمَأْخَذُ الثَّانِي: أَنَّ الِاسْمَ عِنْدَ الْإِطْلَاقِ يَقْتَضِي الْكَمَالَ؛ وَهَذَا غَيْرُ مَعْلُومٍ لِلْمُتَكَلِّمِ كَمَا [قَالَ أَبُو الْعَالِيَةِ: أَدْرَكْت ثَلَاثِينَ مِنْ أَصْحَابِ مُحَمَّدٍ كُلَّهُمْ يَخَافُ النِّفَاقَ عَلَى نَفْسِهِ لَا يَقُولُ إنَّ إيمَانِي كَإِيمَانِ جِبْرِيلَ] (١) فَإِخْبَارُ الرَّجُلِ عَنْ نَفْسِهِ أَنَّهُ كَامِلُ الْإِيمَانِ خَبَرٌ بِمَا لَا يَعْلَمُهُ وَهَذَا مَعْنَى قَوْلِ ابْنِ الْمُنَزَّلِ: أَنَّ الْمُرْجِئَةَ تَقُولُ إنَّ حَسَنَاتِهَا مَقْبُولَةٌ وَأَنَا لَا أَشْهَدُ بِذَلِكَ وَهَذَا مَأْخَذٌ يَصْلُحُ لِوُجُوبِ الِاسْتِثْنَاءِ وَهَذَا الْمَأْخَذُ الثَّانِي لِلْقَاضِي فَإِنَّ الْمُنَازِعَ احْتَجَّ بِأَنَّهُ لَمَّا لَمْ يَجُزْ الِاسْتِثْنَاءُ فِي الْإِسْلَامِ فَكَذَلِكَ فِي الْإِيمَانِ. قَالَ: وَالْجَوَابُ أَنَّ الْإِسْلَامَ مُجَرَّدُ الشَّهَادَتَيْنِ وَقَدْ أَتَى بِهِمَا وَالْإِيمَانُ أَقْوَالٌ وَأَعْمَالٌ لِقَوْلِهِ {الْإِيمَانُ بِضْعٌ وَسَبْعُونَ بَابًا} وَهُوَ لَا يَتَحَقَّقُ كُلُّ ذَلِكَ مِنْهُ. " الْمَأْخَذُ الثَّالِثُ " : أَنَّ ذَلِكَ تَزْكِيَةٌ لِلنَّفْسِ وَقَدْ قَالَ اللَّهُ: {فَلَا تُزَكُّوا أَنْفُسَكُمْ} وَهَذَا يَصْلُحُ لِلِاسْتِحْبَابِ وَإِلَّا فَإِخْبَارُ الرَّجُلِ بِصِفَتِهِ الَّتِي هُوَ عَلَيْهَا جَائِزٌ وَإِنْ كَانَتْ مَدْحًا وَقَدْ يَصْلُحُ لِلْإِيجَابِ قَالَ الْأَثْرَمُ فِي " السُّنَّةِ " : حَدَّثَنَا أَحْمَد بْنُ حَنْبَلٍ سَمِعْت يَحْيَى بْنَ سَعِيدٍ يَقُولُ: مَا أَدْرَكْت أَحَدًا مِنْ أَصْحَابِنَا وَلَا بَلَغَنِي إلَّا عَلَى الِاسْتِثْنَاءِ قَالَ الْأَثْرَمُ سَمِعْت أَبَا عَبْدِ اللَّهِ يَسْأَلُ عَنْ الِاسْتِثْنَاءِ فِي الْإِيمَانِ مَا تَقُولُ فِيهِ؟ قَالَ: أَمَّا أَنَا فَلَا أَعِيبُهُ. . . (٢) فَأَسْتَثْنِي مَخَافَةً وَاحْتِيَاطًا لَيْسَ كَمَا يَقُولُونَ عَلَى الشَّكِّ إنَّمَا يُسْتَثْنَى لِلْعَمَلِ قَالَ أَبُو عَبْدِ اللَّهِ: قَالَ اللَّهُ: {لَتَدْخُلُنَّ الْمَسْجِدَ الْحَرَامَ إنْ شَاءَ اللَّهُ} أَيْ إنَّ هَذَا الِاسْتِثْنَاءَ لِغَيْرِ شَكٍّ وَقَدْ قَالَ النَّبِيُّ
(١) قال الشيخ ناصر بن حمد الفهد (ص ٦٦): وهذا الأثر من قول ابن أبي مليكة كما رواه البخاري معلقاً، وقد ذكره الشيخ رحمه الله ونسبه إلى ابن أبي مليكة مراراً، بل ذكره عنه في المجلد قبل هذا الموضع وبعده (ص ٤٧٠، ٦٨١)، وأظن الموجود هنا تصحيف من النساخ، فإن هذه الصفحة قد وقع فيها سقط أيضا كما في الفقرة التالية، والله أعلم. (٢) سقط في الأصل مقدار نصف سطر قال الشيخ ناصر بن حمد الفهد (ص ٦٧): وكلام الإمام أحمد كاملا برواية الأثرم هو (أما أنا فلا أعيبه، إذا كان يقول: إن الإيمان قول وعمل، يزيد وينقص، فاستثنى مخافة واحتياطا ليس كما يقولون على الشك، إنما يستثنى للعمل) وقد مر ذكره في هذا المجلد بتمامه: ٧/ ٢٥٤، ٢٥٥.

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies