Majmu' al-FatawaIbn Taimiya

and there is no doubt that it encompasses both forms of shirk—minor and major. It also encompasses anyone who arrogantly refuses the obedience Allah has commanded, for such obedience is part of fulfilling the declaration, “There is no deity worthy of worship except Allah.” For God is the One worthy of worship, and everything through which Allah is worshipped contributes to His servants’ complete devotion to Him. Whoever arrogantly refuses any part of His worship, heeding and obeying someone else in doing so, has not fulfilled the declaration, “There is no deity worthy of worship except Allah,” in this respect.

Those who took their rabbis and monks as lords—by obeying them in declaring lawful what Allah had forbidden and forbidding what Allah had made lawful—fall into two categories:

(The first): They know that their leaders have altered Allah’s religion, yet follow them in that alteration. Following their leaders, they believe that what Allah has forbidden is lawful and that what Allah has made lawful is forbidden, despite knowing that they have opposed the religion of the messengers. This is disbelief, and Allah and His Messenger have classified it as shirk—even if they neither pray nor prostrate to those leaders. Thus, whoever follows another in opposition to the religion, knowing that it opposes the religion, and accepts that person’s statements as true rather than those of Allah and His Messenger, is someone who commits shirk, just like these people.

[And (the second): Their belief and conviction that the lawful is forbidden and the forbidden lawful remain firm, but they obey their leaders in disobedience to Allah, just as a Muslim commits sins while believing them to be sins. Such people have the same ruling as other sinners like them.] (*) As is authentically reported in the Sahīh, the Prophet, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, said:

“Obedience is only in what is right.”

He also said:

“A Muslim must hear and obey, whether he likes it or dislikes it, unless he is commanded to sin.”

(*) Shaykh Nāsir ibn Hamad al-Fahd writes (p. 59): Several scholars have suggested that the wording here, “declaring the lawful forbidden and the forbidden lawful,” may be a scribal error. The more likely reading is “declaring the forbidden forbidden and the lawful lawful.”
وَلَا رَيْبَ أَنَّهَا تَتَنَاوَلُ " الشِّرْكَيْنِ " : الْأَصْغَرَ وَالْأَكْبَرَ وَتَتَنَاوَلُ أَيْضًا مَنْ اسْتَكْبَرَ عَمَّا أَمَرَهُ اللَّهُ بِهِ مِنْ طَاعَتِهِ؛ فَإِنَّ ذَلِكَ مِنْ تَحْقِيقِ قَوْلِ لَا إلَهَ إلَّا اللَّهُ؛ فَإِنَّ الْإِلَهَ هُوَ الْمُسْتَحِقُّ لِلْعِبَادَةِ فَكُلُّ مَا يُعْبَدُ بِهِ اللَّهُ فَهُوَ مِنْ تَمَامِ تَأَلُّهِ الْعِبَادِ لَهُ فَمَنْ اسْتَكْبَرَ عَنْ بَعْضِ عِبَادَتِهِ سَامِعًا مُطِيعًا فِي ذَلِكَ لِغَيْرِهِ؛ لَمْ يُحَقِّقْ قَوْلَ: لَا إلَهَ إلَّا اللَّهُ فِي هَذَا الْمَقَامِ. وَهَؤُلَاءِ الَّذِينَ اتَّخَذُوا أَحْبَارَهُمْ وَرُهْبَانَهُمْ أَرْبَابًا - حَيْثُ أَطَاعُوهُمْ فِي تَحْلِيلِ مَا حَرَّمَ اللَّهُ وَتَحْرِيمِ مَا أَحَلَّ اللَّهُ يَكُونُونَ عَلَى وَجْهَيْنِ: (أَحَدُهُمَا) : أَنْ يَعْلَمُوا أَنَّهُمْ بَدَّلُوا دِينَ اللَّهِ فَيَتْبَعُونَهُمْ عَلَى التَّبْدِيلِ فَيَعْتَقِدُونَ تَحْلِيلَ مَا حَرَّمَ اللَّهُ وَتَحْرِيمَ مَا أَحَلَّ اللَّهُ اتِّبَاعًا لِرُؤَسَائِهِمْ مَعَ عِلْمِهِمْ أَنَّهُمْ خَالَفُوا دِينَ الرُّسُلِ فَهَذَا كُفْرٌ وَقَدْ جَعَلَهُ اللَّهُ وَرَسُولُهُ شِرْكًا - وَإِنْ لَمْ يَكُونُوا يُصَلُّونَ لَهُمْ وَيَسْجُدُونَ لَهُمْ - فَكَانَ مَنْ اتَّبَعَ غَيْرَهُ فِي خِلَافِ الدِّينِ مَعَ عِلْمِهِ أَنَّهُ خِلَافُ الدِّينِ وَاعْتَقَدَ مَا قَالَهُ ذَلِكَ دُونَ مَا قَالَهُ اللَّهُ وَرَسُولُهُ؛ مُشْرِكًا مِثْلَ هَؤُلَاءِ. [وَ (الثَّانِي) : أَنْ يَكُونَ اعْتِقَادُهُمْ وَإِيمَانُهُمْ بِتَحْرِيمِ الْحَلَالِ وَتَحْلِيلِ الْحَرَامِ ثَابِتًا لَكِنَّهُمْ أَطَاعُوهُمْ فِي مَعْصِيَةِ اللَّهِ كَمَا يَفْعَلُ الْمُسْلِمُ مَا يَفْعَلُهُ مِنْ الْمَعَاصِي الَّتِي يَعْتَقِدُ أَنَّهَا مَعَاصٍ؛ فَهَؤُلَاءِ لَهُمْ حُكْمُ أَمْثَالِهِمْ مِنْ أَهْلِ الذُّنُوبِ] (*) كَمَا ثَبَتَ فِي " الصَّحِيحِ " عَنْ النَّبِيِّ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ أَنَّهُ قَالَ: {إنَّمَا الطَّاعَةُ فِي الْمَعْرُوفِ} وَقَالَ: {عَلَى الْمُسْلِمِ السَّمْعُ وَالطَّاعَةُ فِيمَا أَحَبَّ أَوْ كَرِهَ مَا لَمْ يُؤْمَرْ بِمَعْصِيَةِ} .
(*) قال الشيخ ناصر بن حمد الفهد (ص ٥٩): وقوله هنا (بتحريم الحلال وتحليل الحرام) قد أشار عدد من أهل العلم إلى أنها قد تكون تصحيفا من النساخ، والأظهر أن العبارة هي (بتحريم الحرام وتحليل الحلال).

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies