Majmu' al-FatawaIbn Taimiya

He—may Allah have mercy on him—was asked:

“A man owns ten out of twenty-four shares in an orchard jointly owned with a mentally impaired person whose management of his property has been restricted by the judge. The orchard is amenable to partition. May the judge carry out the partition on his behalf? Must money from it also be spent on its upkeep?”

He replied:

“If it is amenable to partition and the co-owner requests partition, the judge must grant his request, even if the other co-owner is competent to manage his affairs. How much more so, then, if he is under legal restriction?

“If it is not amenable to partition other than compulsory partition, the judge may carry out the partition on behalf of the person under legal restriction if he considers it to be in his interest.

“If the co-owner requests either partition or upkeep, the judge may grant either of these requests.”

وَسُئِلَ - رَحِمَهُ اللَّهُ -: عَنْ رَجُلٍ لَهُ عَشَرَةُ أَسْهُمٍ مِنْ أَصْلِ أَرْبَعَةٍ وَعِشْرِينَ سَهْمًا فِي بُسْتَانٍ مُشْتَرَكٍ بَيْنَهُ وَبَيْنَ إنْسَانٍ مُخْتَلِّ الْعَقْلِ وَالْحَاكِمُ يَحْجُرُ عَلَيْهِ وَهُوَ يَقْبَلُ الْقِسْمَةَ: فَهَلْ لِلْحَاكِمِ أَنْ يَقْسِمَ عَلَيْهِ أَمْ لَا؟ وَيَلْزَمُ أَنْ يُنْفِقَ مِنْهُ عَلَى الْعِمَارَةِ؟ فَأَجَابَ: إنْ كَانَ قَابِلًا لِلْقِسْمَةِ وَطَلَبَ الشَّرِيكُ الْقَسْمَ وَجَبَ عَلَى الْحَاكِمِ إجَابَتُهُ وَلَوْ كَانَ الشَّرِيكُ الْآخَرُ رَشِيدًا فَكَيْفَ إذَا كَانَ تَحْتَ الْحَجْرِ؟ وَإِنْ لَمْ يَكُنْ قَابِلًا لِلْقِسْمَةِ غَيْرَ قِسْمَةِ الْإِجْبَارِ وَلِلْحَاكِمِ أَنْ يُقَاسِمَ عَنْ الْمَحْجُورِ عَلَيْهِ إذَا رَآهُ مَصْلَحَةً. وَإِذَا طَلَبَ الشَّرِيكُ: إمَّا الْقِسْمَةَ وَإِمَّا الْعِمَارَةَ: فَلِلْحَاكِمِ أَنْ يُجِيبَهُ إلَى أَحَدِهِمَا.

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies