Majmu' al-FatawaIbn Taimiya

such as the report recorded in the two authentic hadith collections from al-Ash‘ath ibn Qays, who said:

“I had a dispute with a man over a well, and we brought our case before the Prophet, may Allah bless him and grant him peace. He said: ‘Produce your two witnesses; otherwise, he must swear an oath.’ I said: ‘Then he will swear without a care!’ He replied: ‘Whoever swears a false oath to deprive a Muslim of his property will meet Allah while He is angry with him.’”

In another version, he said: “Produce your evidence that the well is yours; otherwise, he must swear an oath.”

It is also narrated from Wā’il ibn Hujr, who said:

“A man from Hadramawt and a man from Kindah came to the Prophet, may Allah bless him and grant him peace. The man from Hadramawt said: ‘O Messenger of Allah, this man has seized land that belonged to my father.’ The man from Kindah said: ‘It is my land, in my possession, and I cultivate it. He has no right to it.’

“The Prophet, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, asked the man from Hadramawt: ‘Do you have any proof?’ He replied: ‘No.’ He said: ‘Then you are entitled to require his oath.’ The man said: ‘O Messenger of Allah, he is wicked. He does not care what he swears to and has no scruples about anything.’ He replied: ‘You are entitled to nothing more from him.’

“When the man turned away, the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, said: ‘If he swears an oath concerning property in order to appropriate it wrongfully, he will surely meet Allah while He turns away from him.’”

Reported by Muslim and al-Tirmidhī, who graded it authentic.

This authentic hadith shows that he required nothing of the defendant beyond an oath, even though the claimant had mentioned his wickedness. He said: “You are entitled to nothing more from him.” Likewise, in the first hadith, al-Ash‘ath’s opponent was a Jew, as stated in the two authentic collections. Nevertheless, he required nothing of him beyond an oath. And in the hadith concerning the oath procedure in homicide cases, when the Ansār said:

مِثْلَ مَا خَرَّجَا فِي الصَّحِيحَيْنِ عَنْ {الْأَشْعَثِ بْنِ قَيْسٍ أَنَّهُ قَالَ: كَانَتْ بَيْنِي وَبَيْنَ رَجُلٍ حُكُومَةٌ فِي بِئْرٍ؛ فَاخْتَصَمْنَا إلَى النَّبِيِّ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ فَقَالَ: شَاهِدَاك أَوْ يَمِينُهُ فَقُلْت: إذًا يَحْلِفُ وَلَا يُبَالِي فَقَالَ: مَنْ حَلَفَ عَلَى يَمِينِ صَبْرٍ يَقْطَعُ بِهَا مَالَ امْرِئٍ مُسْلِمٍ هُوَ فِيهَا فَاجِرٌ لَقِيَ اللَّهَ وَهُوَ عَلَيْهِ غضبان وَفِي رِوَايَةٍ فَقَالَ بَيِّنَتُك أَنَّهَا بِئْرُك؛ وَإِلَّا فَيَمِينُهُ} وَعَنْ وَائِلِ بْنِ حجر قَالَ: {جَاءَ رَجُلٌ مِنْ حَضْرَمَوْتَ وَرَجُلٌ مِنْ كِنْدَةَ إلَى النَّبِيِّ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ فَقَالَ الْحَضْرَمِيُّ: يَا رَسُولَ اللَّهِ إنَّ هَذَا قَدْ غَلَبَنِي عَلَى أَرْضٍ كَانَتْ لِأَبِي. فَقَالَ الْكِنْدِيُّ: هِيَ أَرْضِي وَبِيَدِي أَزْرَعُهَا لَيْسَ لَهُ فِيهَا حَقٌّ. فَقَالَ: النَّبِيُّ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ لِلْحَضْرَمِيِّ: أَلَك بَيِّنَةٌ؟ قَالَ: لَا. قَالَ: فَلَك يَمِينُهُ فَقَالَ يَا رَسُولَ اللَّهِ الرَّجُلُ فَاجِرٌ لَا يُبَالِي عَلَى مَا حَلَفَ عَلَيْهِ فَلَيْسَ يَتَوَرَّعُ مِنْ شَيْءٍ فَقَالَ: لَيْسَ لَك مِنْهُ إلَّا ذَلِكَ فَقَالَ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ لَمَّا أَدْبَرَ الرَّجُلُ أَمَا لَئِنْ حَلَفَ عَلَى مَالٍ لِيَأْكُلَهُ ظُلْمًا لَيَلْقَيَنَّ اللَّهَ وَهُوَ عَنْهُ مُعْرِضٌ} رَوَاهُ مُسْلِمٌ وَالتِّرْمِذِيُّ وَصَحَّحَهُ. فَفِي هَذَا الْحَدِيثِ الصَّحِيحِ أَنَّهُ لَمْ يُوجِبْ عَلَى الْمَطْلُوبِ إلَّا الْيَمِينَ مَعَ ذِكْرِ الْمُدَّعِي لِفُجُورِهِ وَقَالَ " لَيْسَ لَك مِنْهُ إلَّا ذَلِكَ " وَكَذَلِكَ فِي الْحَدِيثِ الْأَوَّلِ كَانَ خَصْمُ الْأَشْعَثِ يَهُودِيًّا هَكَذَا جَاءَ فِي الصَّحِيحَيْنِ وَمَعَ هَذَا لَمْ يُوجِبْ عَلَيْهِ إلَّا الْيَمِينَ وَفِي حَدِيثِ الْقَسَامَةِ أَنَّ الْأَنْصَارَ لَمَّا قَالُوا:

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies