Majmu' al-FatawaIbn Taimiya

a third, it does not normally cause intoxication unless something is added to strengthen it, or for some other reason. Whenever it causes intoxication, it is forbidden by the consensus of the Muslims. This is the drink known as “tilā’” (boiled grape juice), which ‘Umar ibn al-Khattāb permitted the Muslims to drink. If, however, it causes intoxication after being boiled until two-thirds has evaporated, it is also forbidden according to Mālik, al-Shāfi‘ī, and Ahmad.

He—may Allah Most High have mercy on him—was asked about habitual wine-drinking and abandonment of prayer, and the ruling concerning someone who persists in this.

He replied:

Praise be to Allah.

As for the “wine drinker,” the imams agree that he must receive the prescribed flogging if his drinking is proven. His prescribed punishment is forty or eighty lashes. Administering eighty lashes is permissible by agreement of the imams. If only forty are administered, however, there is a well-known disagreement over whether this suffices.

The position of Abū Hanīfah, Mālik, and Ahmad—according to one of the two reports from him—is that eighty lashes are obligatory. The position of al-Shāfi‘ī and Ahmad—according to the other report from him—is that the additional forty lashes constitute discretionary punishment, left to the ruler’s judgment. If this is needed because drinking has become widespread, because the drinker persists, or for similar reasons, he imposes them.

‘Umar ibn al-Khattāb used to impose discretionary punishments beyond this. It is reported that he would banish the drinker from his town and disfigure him by shaving his head.

ثُلُثُهُ: فَهَذَا لَا يُسْكِرُ فِي الْعَادَةِ؛ إلَّا إذَا انْضَمَّ إلَيْهِ مَا يُقَوِّيهِ أَوْ لِسَبَبِ آخَرَ. فَمَتَى أَسْكَرَ فَهُوَ حَرَامٌ بِإِجْمَاعِ الْمُسْلِمِينَ وَهُوَ " الطِّلَاءُ " الَّذِي أَبَاحَهُ عُمَرُ بْنُ الْخَطَّابِ لِلْمُسْلِمِينَ. وَأَمَّا إنْ أَسْكَرَ بَعْدَ مَا طُبِخَ وَذَهَبَ ثُلُثَاهُ: فَهُوَ حَرَامٌ أَيْضًا عِنْدَ مَالِكٍ وَالشَّافِعِيِّ وَأَحْمَد. وَسُئِلَ - رَحِمَهُ اللَّهُ تَعَالَى -: عَنْ الْمُدَاوَمَةِ عَلَى شُرْبِ الْخَمْرِ وَتَرْكِ الصَّلَاةِ وَمَا حُكْمُهُ فِي الْإِصْرَارِ عَلَى ذَلِكَ؟ فَأَجَابَ: الْحَمْدُ لِلَّهِ، أَمَّا " شَارِبُ الْخَمْرِ " فَيَجِبُ بِاتِّفَاقِ الْأَئِمَّةِ أَنْ يُجْلَدَ الْحَدَّ إذَا ثَبَتَ ذَلِكَ عَلَيْهِ وَحَدُّهُ أَرْبَعُونَ جَلْدَةً أَوْ ثَمَانُونَ جَلْدَةً. فَإِنْ جَلَدَهُ ثَمَانِينَ جَازَ بِاتِّفَاقِ الْأَئِمَّةِ وَإِنْ اقْتَصَرَ عَلَى الْأَرْبَعِينَ فَفِي الْإِجْزَاءِ نِزَاعٌ مَشْهُورٌ فَمَذْهَبُ أَبِي حَنِيفَةَ وَمَالِكٍ وَأَحْمَد فِي إحْدَى الرِّوَايَتَيْنِ أَنَّهُ يَجِبُ الثَّمَانُونَ وَمَذْهَبُ الشَّافِعِيِّ وَأَحْمَد فِي الرِّوَايَةِ الْأُخْرَى عَنْهُ أَنَّ الْأَرْبَعِينَ الثَّانِيَةَ تَعْزِيرٌ يُرْجَعُ فِيهَا إلَى اجْتِهَادِ الْإِمَامِ فَإِنْ احْتَاجَ إلَى ذَلِكَ لِكَثْرَةِ الشُّرْبِ أَوْ إصْرَارِ الشَّارِبِ وَنَحْوِ ذَلِكَ فَعَلَ وَقَدْ كَانَ عُمَرُ بْنُ الْخَطَّابِ يُعَزِّرُ بِأَكْثَرِ مِنْ ذَلِكَ؛ كَمَا رُوِيَ عَنْهُ أَنَّهُ كَانَ يَنْفِي الشَّارِبَ عَنْ بَلَدِهِ وَيُمَثِّلُ بِهِ بِحَلْقِ رَأْسِهِ.

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies