Majmu' al-FatawaIbn Taimiya

and there is no harm in it.”

He said: “The apparent meaning of this is that he permitted shops and a drinking-water facility to be established beneath the mosque.”

He said: “This must be understood as applying where a need arose for this because it would benefit the mosque.”

He said: “Our shaykh Abū ʿAbd Allāh—that is, Ibn Hāmid—used to prohibit this. He interpreted the case as concerning a disagreement at the outset of the mosque’s construction, before it was made an endowment.”

He said: “Our principles do not preclude permitting this when it serves a beneficial purpose, since we permit selling the mosque and relocating it elsewhere.”

He said: “Ahmad also said, as reported by Bakr ibn Muhammad, concerning a mosque that was not secure against dogs and other animals and had a minaret: he permitted the minaret to be dismantled and its materials used to build the mosque’s wall, because this served a beneficial purpose.”

Ibn ʿAqīl inclined towards Ibn Hāmid’s view in al-Fusūl, saying: “This must be understood as applying where a need arose for it. Just as, in his view, altering and relocating a mosque was permissible only when needed, this unqualified statement must be understood in that light, not as applying to an already established mosque.”

He said: “The more fitting interpretation is that this concerns a mosque whose construction is just beginning. On this interpretation, they disagreed over how it should be built. Once it has become a mosque, however, it may neither be sold nor have a drinking-water facility established beneath it.”

Abū Muhammad likewise preferred Ibn Hāmid’s view, saying: “It is more correct and more appropriate, even though it runs contrary to the apparent meaning.”

He said: “A mosque may not be relocated or replaced, nor may its courtyard be sold and converted into a drinking-water facility and shops, unless it can no longer be used. The need for a drinking-water facility and shops does not render the mosque unusable, so it may not be diverted to that purpose.”

He said: “If it were permissible to turn

وَلَا بَأْسَ بِهِ. قَالَ فَظَاهِرُ هَذَا أَنَّهُ أَجَازَ أَنْ يُجْعَلَ سُفْلُ الْمَسْجِدِ حَوَانِيتَ وَسِقَايَةً. قَالَ: وَيَجِبُ أَنْ يُحْمَلَ هَذَا عَلَى أَنَّ الْحَاجَةَ دَعَتْ إلَى ذَلِكَ لِمَصْلَحَةِ تَعُودُ بِالْمَسْجِدِ. قَالَ: وَكَانَ شَيْخُنَا أَبُو عَبْدِ اللَّهِ - هُوَ ابْنُ حَامِدٍ - يَمْنَعُ مِنْ ذَلِكَ؛ وَيَتَأَوَّلُ الْمَسْأَلَةَ عَلَى أَنَّهُمْ اخْتَلَفُوا فِي ذَلِكَ عِنْدَ ابْتِدَاءِ بِنَاءِ الْمَسْجِدِ قَبْلَ وَقْفِهِ. قَالَ: وَلَيْسَ يَمْتَنِعُ عَلَى أَصْلِنَا جَوَازُ ذَلِكَ إذَا كَانَ فِيهِ مَصْلَحَةٌ لِأَنَّا نُجِيزُ بَيْعَهُ وَنَقْلَهُ إلَى مَوْضِعٍ آخَرَ. قَالَ: وَقَدْ قَالَ أَحْمَدُ فِي رِوَايَةِ بَكْرِ بْنِ مُحَمَّدٍ فِي مَسْجِدٍ لَيْسَ بِحَصِينِ مِنْ الْكِلَابِ وَغَيْرِهَا وَلَهُ مَنَارَةٌ فَرُخِّصَ فِي نَقْضِهَا وَيُبْنَى بِهَا حَائِطُ الْمَسْجِدِ لِلْمَصْلَحَةِ. وَمَالَ ابْنُ عَقِيلٍ فِي " الْفُصُولِ " إلَى قَوْلِ ابْنِ حَامِدٍ فَقَالَ: هَذَا يَجِبُ أَنْ يُحْمَلَ عَلَى أَنَّ الْحَاجَةَ دَعَتْ إلَى ذَلِكَ كَمَا أَنَّ تَغْيِيرَ الْمَسْجِدِ وَنَقْلَهُ مَا جَازَ عِنْدَهُ إلَّا لِلْحَاجَةِ فَيُحْمَلُ هَذَا الْإِطْلَاقُ عَلَى ذَلِكَ؛ لَا عَلَى الْمُسْتَقَرِّ. قَالَ: وَالْأَشْبَهُ أَنْ يُحْمَلَ عَلَى مَسْجِدٍ يُبْتَدَأُ إنْشَاؤُهُ. وَعَلَى هَذَا فَاخْتَلَفُوا كَيْفَ يُبْنَى؟ فَأَمَّا بَعْدَ كَوْنِهِ مَسْجِدًا فَلَا يَجُوزُ أَنْ يُبَاعَ وَلَا أَنْ يُجْعَلَ سِقَايَةً تَحْتَهُ. وَكَذَلِكَ رَجَّحَ أَبُو مُحَمَّدٍ قَوْلَ ابْنِ حَامِدٍ وَقَالَ: هُوَ أَصَحُّ وَأَوْلَى وَإِنْ خَالَفَ الظَّاهِرَ. قَالَ: فَإِنَّ الْمَسْجِدَ لَا يَجُوزُ نَقْلُهُ وَإِبْدَالُهُ وَبَيْعُ سَاحَتِهِ وَجَعْلُهَا سِقَايَةً وَحَوَانِيتَ إلَّا عِنْدَ تَعَذُّرِ الِانْتِفَاعِ وَالْحَاجَةِ إلَى سِقَايَةٍ وَحَوَانِيتَ لَا يُعَطِّلُ نَفْعَ الْمَسْجِدِ فَلَا يَجُوزُ صَرْفُهُ فِي ذَلِكَ. قَالَ: وَلَوْ جَازَ جَعْلُ

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies