Majmu' al-FatawaIbn Taimiya

of achieving that end, Allah permitted them, unlike unclean medicines.

Indeed, it has even been said that seeking healing through unclean medicines indicates a sickness in one’s heart—that is, in one’s faith. For if a person were among the believing members of Muhammad’s community, Allah would not have placed his healing in what He had forbidden him. Hence, when someone is compelled by necessity to eat carrion or the like, eating it becomes obligatory according to the well-known position in the schools of the four imams. Medical treatment, however, is not obligatory according to most scholars, even when lawful remedies are used. They differed over whether it is better to seek treatment or to forgo it out of reliance upon Allah.

This is further clarified by the fact that when Allah forbade carrion, blood, pork and other such things, He permitted them only to those compelled by necessity, neither seeking them out nor exceeding the limits. In another verse, He says:

“But whoever is forced by severe hunger, with no inclination to sin—then indeed, Allah is Forgiving and Merciful.”

It is known that a person seeking medical treatment is not compelled by necessity to use these things; thus, they have not become lawful for him.

As for what is permitted on grounds of need, and not only dire necessity—such as wearing silk—it is established in the Sahīh:

“The Prophet—may Allah bless him and grant him peace—permitted al-Zubayr and ‘Abd al-Rahmān ibn ‘Awf to wear silk because of itching from which they both suffered.”

This is permissible according to the more correct of the scholars’ two views, because wearing silk is forbidden only when one has no need of it. Hence, it is permitted for women because of their need to adorn themselves with it, and they are permitted to use it to cover themselves without restriction. The need to use it for medical treatment warrants the same permission—indeed, all the more so. Such clothing was prohibited because it involves

إلَى الْمَقْصُودِ أَبَاحَهَا اللَّهُ بِخِلَافِ الْأَدْوِيَةِ الْخَبِيثَةِ. بَلْ قَدْ قِيلَ: مَنْ اسْتَشْفَى بِالْأَدْوِيَةِ الْخَبِيثَةِ كَانَ دَلِيلًا عَلَى مَرَضٍ فِي قَلْبِهِ وَذَلِكَ فِي إيمَانِهِ فَإِنَّهُ لَوْ كَانَ مِنْ أُمَّةِ مُحَمَّدٍ الْمُؤْمِنِينَ لَمَا جَعَلَ اللَّهُ شِفَاءَهُ فِيمَا حَرَّمَ عَلَيْهِ وَلِهَذَا إذَا اُضْطُرَّ إلَى الْمَيْتَةِ وَنَحْوِهَا وَجَبَ عَلَيْهِ الْأَكْلُ فِي الْمَشْهُورِ مِنْ مَذَاهِبِ الْأَئِمَّةِ الْأَرْبَعَةِ وَأَمَّا التَّدَاوِي فَلَا يَجِبُ عِنْدَ أَكْثَرِ الْعُلَمَاءِ بِالْحَلَالِ وَتَنَازَعُوا: هَلْ الْأَفْضَلُ فِعْلُهُ؟ أَوْ تَرْكُهُ عَلَى طَرِيقِ التَّوَكُّلِ؟ . وَمِمَّا يُبَيِّنُ ذَلِكَ أَنَّ اللَّهَ لَمَّا حَرَّمَ الْمَيْتَةَ وَالدَّمَ وَلَحْمَ الْخِنْزِيرِ وَغَيْرَهَا لَمْ يُبِحْ ذَلِكَ إلَّا لِمَنْ اُضْطُرَّ إلَيْهَا غَيْرَ بَاغٍ وَلَا عَادٍ وَفِي آيَةٍ أُخْرَى: {فَمَنِ اضْطُرَّ فِي مَخْمَصَةٍ غَيْرَ مُتَجَانِفٍ لِإِثْمٍ فَإِنَّ اللَّهَ غَفُورٌ رَحِيمٌ} وَمَعْلُومٌ أَنَّ الْمُتَدَاوِيَ غَيْرُ مُضْطَرٍّ إلَيْهَا فَعُلِمَ أَنَّهَا لَمْ تَحِلَّ لَهُ. وَأَمَّا مَا أُبِيحَ لِلْحَاجَةِ لَا لِمُجَرَّدِ الضَّرُورَةِ: كَلِبَاسِ الْحَرِيرِ، فَقَدْ ثَبَتَ فِي الصَّحِيحِ: {أَنَّ النَّبِيَّ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ رَخَّصَ لِلزُّبَيْرِ وَعَبْدِ الرَّحْمَنِ بْنِ عَوْفٍ فِي لُبْسِ الْحَرِيرِ لِحَكَّةٍ كَانَتْ بِهِمَا} وَهَذَا جَائِزٌ عَلَى أَصَحِّ قَوْلَيْ الْعُلَمَاءِ؛ لِأَنَّ لُبْسَ الْحَرِيرِ إنَّمَا حُرِّمَ عِنْدَ الِاسْتِغْنَاءِ عَنْهُ، وَلِهَذَا أُبِيحَ لِلنِّسَاءِ لِحَاجَتِهِنَّ إلَى التَّزَيُّنِ بِهِ وَأُبِيحَ لَهُنَّ التَّسَتُّرُ بِهِ مُطْلَقًا فَالْحَاجَةُ إلَى التَّدَاوِي بِهِ كَذَلِكَ بَلْ أَوْلَى وَهَذِهِ حُرِّمَتْ لِمَا فِيهَا مِنْ

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies